The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis
Open accessAbstract
This research is part of an effort that the ICT (Institute of Tropical Cultivation) has been doing for several years tending to develop superior genotypes of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). That is why this study aims to find tolerant or moderately tolerant cocoa genotypes and accessions to water stress with resistance to pests and diseases and high production and industrial quality. Twenty genotypes of cocoa seedlings were investigated, during the period of 6 months, in a soil with sandy-loam texture under nursery conditions, of controlled irrigation. A split plot design was used, with 40 treatments and 3 repetitions. In addition, daily data of the micro climatic characteristics (T °, HR) were taken, in which different indicators of variable were evaluated such as the stomatal conductance (CE) that is greatly influenced by the T ° and HR. The results obtained indicate that the genotypes that showed moderate tolerance to water stress were UNG - 77, UNG - 53, ICT - 1281 and ICT - 1112; the non-tolerant ones were PAS - 93, CEPEC - 2002, ICT - 2142, ICT - 1092, CP - 2005 - C10, TSH - 1188, CCN - 51, IMC - 67, PH - 17, AYP - 15, ICS - 6, BN - 34, ICT - 1506, PAS - 91, PH - 990 and ICS - 1. Under optimal conditions, the most outstanding genotype was ICS-1, both in plant height, number of leaves, and stomatal conductance, this being proof that this genotype develops excellently and stands out if it has the right conditions and water availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Self-citation
Cited by
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Self-citationPhotosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp096 · Cited by 1,678
Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationSUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Metadata
- Authors
- Farquhar, G. D., & Sharkey, T. D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 317-345
- ISSN
- 0066-4294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146719438
- Cited by
- 4,159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 83.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533
- The paper
- Farquhar, G. D., & Sharkey, T. D. (1982). Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.