The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personnel Selection and Classification Systems
Abstract
THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF PERSONNEL SELECTION .... . . ....... ..... ... . . ... 478 Milestones: Personnel Selection Thinking, Research, Technology 478 The Conservation of Human Talent: 1975-80 481 VALIDITY AND VALIDATION.... . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . ........ .. . ... 482 JOB ANALY SI S .... . ... ... . . . ... ... ..... ..... ...... . . .... 484 JOB PERFORMANCE MEA SUREMENT... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486 Format Comparisons and Rater Training 486 Internal Dimensionality and External Validity of Performance Ratings 488 Individual Diff erences Correlates of Performance Ratings 489 STA TI STICAL CONSI DERATIONS 490 Validity Estimates and Problems of Shrinkage .... ...... .... ......... ........ 490 Validity Generalization 492 Utility 493 Nonlinear Prediction ..... ..... 494 P SYCHOMETRICS OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITy. ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . 496 Diff erential Validity 496 Test Fairness ....... ..... 497 LABOR MARKET I SSUES ... ... . . . . ..... . ..... ... ... .... .. .... . . .... ... .... . .... ...... .. ... . . . . . ... ..... 502 Labor Markets. Availabilities. and Human Resources Planning 502 SELEC TION PRACTICES: RESEARCH RESULTS . . . .... .... ..... ..... ....... . .... S04 The Selection Interview ... ..... .... 505 Biographical Information 509 Multiple Assessment Procedures ..... ......... .... 510 Job Samples ..... ........ 513 Miscellaneous Other Studies ........ 513 CONTEXT OF THE FUTURE IN PERSONNEL SELEC TION 514
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181
Cited by
Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.64.6.609 · Cited by 423
Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing.
Landy, F. J. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.41.11.1183 · Cited by 263
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices
Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 176
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
(2023) · The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603202
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 477-525
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W1984716187
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personnel Selection and Classification Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002401
- The paper
- Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel Selection and Classification Systems. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
