Cited by 129Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionLanguage and cultural evolution

Evolutionary Psychology: Toward a Unifying Theory and a Hybrid Science

Caporael, Linnda R.·2001·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Although evolutionary psychology is typically associated with "selfish gene theory," numerous other approaches to the study of mind and behavior provide a wealth of concepts for theorizing about psychology, culture, and development. These include general evolutionary approaches and theories focused on sociality, dual inheritance, multilevel selection, and developmental systems. Most evolutionary accounts use the same methods as Darwin-the "fit among facts"-to use natural selection as an explanation for behavior. Scientific standards for constraining and evaluating such accounts, research into the mutual influence of science and society on the understanding of evolution, and computational technologies for modeling species-typical processes are important considerations. Coevolutionary theories and developmental systems theories may eventually give rise to unification in a broad and general sense. Such a unification would be interdisciplinary and problem centered rather than discipline centered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans are inherently social beings whose lives are characterized by obligatory interdependence.

    “Humans are inherently social beings, whose lives are charac- terized by what Caporael and Brewer (1995) referred to as ob- ligatory interdependence (Brewer, 2004; Caporael, 2001; A.P. Fiske, 1991).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 172 · Cited by 129

Authors
Caporael, L. R.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Caporael, Linnda R.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2001-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
607-628
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2127691599
Cited by
129
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, unifying theory, selfish gene theory, natural selection, sociality, multilevel selection, developmental systems theory, coevolution, science and society, computational modeling of behavior, interdisciplinary unification, culture and development
MeSH terms
Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review