Evolutionary Psychology: Toward a Unifying Theory and a Hybrid Science
Abstract
Although evolutionary psychology is typically associated with "selfish gene theory," numerous other approaches to the study of mind and behavior provide a wealth of concepts for theorizing about psychology, culture, and development. These include general evolutionary approaches and theories focused on sociality, dual inheritance, multilevel selection, and developmental systems. Most evolutionary accounts use the same methods as Darwin-the "fit among facts"-to use natural selection as an explanation for behavior. Scientific standards for constraining and evaluating such accounts, research into the mutual influence of science and society on the understanding of evolution, and computational technologies for modeling species-typical processes are important considerations. Coevolutionary theories and developmental systems theories may eventually give rise to unification in a broad and general sense. Such a unification would be interdisciplinary and problem centered rather than discipline centered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Humans are inherently social beings whose lives are characterized by obligatory interdependence.
“Humans are inherently social beings, whose lives are charac- terized by what Caporael and Brewer (1995) referred to as ob- ligatory interdependence (Brewer, 2004; Caporael, 2001; A.P. Fiske, 1991).”
From Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies (2006) · cites this paper as Caporael, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 172 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Caporael, L. R.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Caporael, Linnda R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 607-628
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2127691599
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 172
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- evolutionary psychology, unifying theory, selfish gene theory, natural selection, sociality, multilevel selection, developmental systems theory, coevolution, science and society, computational modeling of behavior, interdisciplinary unification, culture and development
- MeSH terms
- Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review