The Psychology and Neurobiology of Suicidal Behavior
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of death, but it is not well understood or well researched. Our purpose in this review is to summarize extant knowledge on neurobiological and psychological factors involved in suicide, with specific goals of identifying areas particularly in need of future research and of articulating an initial agenda that may guide future research. We conclude that from both neurobiological and psychological perspectives, extant research findings converge on the view that two general categories of risk for suicide can be identified: (a) dysregulated impulse control; and (b) propensity to intense psychological pain (e.g., social isolation, hopelessness), often in the context of mental disorders, especially mood disorders. Each of these categories of risk is underlain at least to some degree by specific genetic and neurobiological factors; these factors in general are not well characterized, though there is emerging consensus that most if not all reside in or affect the serotonergic system. We encourage future theorizing that is conceptually precise, as well as epistemically broad, about the specific preconditions of serious suicidal behavior, explaining the daunting array of suicide-related facts from the molecular to the cultural level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experiencing intolerable levels of psychological pain is associated with increased suicide risk in both clinical and non-clinical populations.
“Experiencing intolerable levels of psychological pain has been associated with increased suicide risk [12] in both clinical and non-clinical populations [13].”
From Targeting Psychological Pain After a Suicide Attempt: Scoping Review and Intervention Protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Initial attempts to understand the components of psychological pain and their relationship with suicide attempt focused on a perceived lack of belonging, being an increased burden on others, and acquired capability.
“Initial attempts to understand the components of psychological pain and their relationship with suicide attempt initially focused on a perceived lack of belonging, being an increased burden on others, and acquired capability (that is, the ability to engage in suicidal behaviours) 10,114 .”
From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [114]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 204 · Cited by 481
- Authors
- Joiner, T. E., Brown, J. S., & Wingate, L. R.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 287-314
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2147911020
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 204
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- suicide, suicidal behavior, neurobiology of suicide, impulsivity, psychological suffering, hopelessness, social isolation, mood disorders, genetic risk factors, serotonergic system, suicide risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Aggression, Mental Disorders, Brain, Culture, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Risk Factors, Serotonin, Social Isolation, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review