Neuroecology
Abstract
Neuroecology is the study of adaptive variation in cognition and the brain. The origin of neuroecology dates from the 1980s, when researchers in behavioral ecology began to apply the methods of comparative evolutionary biology to cognitive processes and the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition. The comparative approach, however, is much older. It was a mainstay of ethology, it has been part of the study of neuroanatomy since the seventeenth century, and it was used by Darwin to marshal evidence for the theory of natural selection. Neuroecology examines the relations between ecological selection pressures and species or sex differences in cognition and the brain. The goal of neuroecology is to understand how natural selection acts on cognition and its neural mechanisms. This chapter describes the general approach of neuroecology, phylogenetic comparative methods used in the field, and new findings on the cognitive mechanisms and brain structures involved in mating systems, social organization, communication, and foraging. The contribution of neuroecology to psychology and the neurosciences is the information it provides on the selective pressures that have influenced the evolution of cognition and brain structure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive evidence in birds suggests that the processing and storage of spatial information contributing to episodic-like memory is dependent on the avian hippocampus.
“While extensive evidence in birds suggests that the processing and storage of spatial information contributing to episodic-like memory is dependent on the avian hippocampus [130–132]”
From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 136 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Sherry, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sherry, David F.
- ORCID
- Sherry, David F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 167-197
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W4246690015
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- neuroecology, cognitive evolution, natural selection, phylogenetic comparative analysis, brain evolution, sex differences in cognition, mating systems, social organization, animal communication, foraging, ethology, Charles Darwin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Brain, Cognition, Environment, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Phylogeny, Seasons, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Factors, Prosencephalon, Reproductive Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review