The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Current Status and Prospects of Multiline Cultivars and Variety Mixtures for Disease Resistance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological consequences of genetic diversity
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N., & Vellend, M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x · Cited by 1,834
Molecular Genetics of Plant Disease Resistance
Staskawicz, B. J., Ausubel, F. M., Baker, B. J., Ellis, J. G., & Jones, J. D. G. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7732374 · Cited by 914
Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance
Tollenaar, M., & Wu, J. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961597x · Cited by 609
Combining Selective Pressures to Enhance the Durability of Disease Resistance Genes
REX Consortium (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01916 · Cited by 574
The population genetics of plant pathogens and breeding strategies for durable resistance
McDonald, B. A., & Linde, C. (2002) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/a:1015678432355 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, M. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 251-273
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2120343732
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Current Status and Prospects of Multiline Cultivars and Variety Mixtures for Disease Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.001343
- The paper
- Wolfe, M. S. (1985). The Current Status and Prospects of Multiline Cultivars and Variety Mixtures for Disease Resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.001343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
