The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of Pectic Enzymes in Plant Pathogenesis
Abstract
cell components. A convincing role in pathogenesis, however, has been es tablished only for those enzymes that attack the pectic fraction of the plant cell wall. Several fundamental advances in our understanding of these enzymes have been made since the role of pectic enzymes in tissue degradation was reviewed in this series by Bateman & Millar (17) twenty years ago. In the past decade it was demonstrated that highly purified pectic enzymes could macer ate and kill plant tissues in a manner similar to that occurring in soft-rot diseases; that the same enzymes could be used to disassemble the dicot primary cell wall, thus revealing the structural importance of pectic polymers in cell-wall architecture; and that a relationship exists between the enzymatic vulnerability of pectic polymers in the cell wall and the regulation of pectic enzyme synthesis in pathogenic fungi. In the present decade it has been demonstrated that fragments released from the cell wall by pectic enzymes can elicit plant defense reactions and that the highly pectolytic bacteria, Erwinia chrysanthemi and E. carotovora, are amenable to a powerful array of molecular genetic manipulations. This paper considers these most recent advances and attempts to project future progress. The following steps occur during the interaction of a pectolytic pathogen and a potential host: (a) The entering pathogen possesses structural genes encoding pectic enzymes with particular physical and catalytic properties. (b)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fusarium oxysporum : exploring the molecular arsenal of a vascular wilt fungus
Pietro, A. D., Madrid, M. P., Caracuel, Z., Delgado‐Jarana, J., & Roncero, M. I. G. (2003) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00180.x · Cited by 464
Microbiological Spoilage of Fruits and Vegetables
Barth, M., Hankinson, T. R., Zhuang, H., & Breidt, F. (2009) · Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0826-1_6 · Cited by 331
The biology and control of Colletotrichum species on tropical fruit crops
JEFFRIES, P., DODD, J. C., JEGER, M. J., & PLUMBLEY, R. A. (1990) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02512.x · Cited by 260
A comparative study of pectinolytic enzyme production by Bacillus species
Torimiro, N., & Okonji, E. R. (2013) · African Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.5897/ajb2013.12421 · Cited by 40
“They have also been reported to be responsible for spoilage of fruits and vegetables (Collmer and Keen, 1986; Whitaker, 1990).”
BackgroundMurmu, S., Rashmi, M., Nagrale, D. T., Kour, T., Singh, M. K., Chaurasia, A., Behera, S. K., Shankar, R., Ranjan, R., Jha, G. K., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cotton Research · doi:10.1186/s42397-024-00203-z · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Collmer, A., & Keen, N. T.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 383-409
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2174939116
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Pectic Enzymes in Plant Pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.py.24.090186.002123
- The paper
- Collmer, A., & Keen, N. T. (1986). The Role of Pectic Enzymes in Plant Pathogenesis. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.24.090186.002123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.