Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 679

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fungal Vegetative Compatibility

Leslie, John F.·1993·Annual Review of Phytopathology

Abstract

Heterokaryon fonnation between different fungal individuals is an important component of many fungal life cycles and may serve as the first step in the parasexual cycle and the transmission of hypovirulent factors such as dsRNAs. Heterokaryosis also is a means by which nonnally haploid fungi may enjoy the benefits of functional diploidy, such as complementation or heterosis. In plant pathogenic fungi, the entity that emerges following heterokaryosis may differ from its constituents in aggressiveness or host range; some of these aspects have been reviewed in previous volumes in this series (9, 28, 45, 62, 72, 112, 114, 117, 143, 154, 158, 160). In most heterothallic fungi, the fonnation of a heterokaryon between two genetically different haploid strains is an essential part of the life cycle. Such heterokaryons may be quite stable and persist for an indefinite period of time or may last only long enough for the component haploid nuclei to fuse and then immediately undergo meiosis. In many fungi, sexual and vegetative heterokaryons are quite distinct from one another. Strains capable of fonning a successful sexual heterokaryon may be unable to fonn a successful vegetative heterokaryon and vice versa. Strains that are capable of fonning these types of heterokaryons are referred to as sexually or vegetatively compatible, respectively. Strains that are vege­ tatively compatible with one another are frequently described as members of the same vegetative compatibility group, or VCG. Sexual compatibility is usually governed by one or more mating-type loci that may have two or more alleles (58, 62). Vegetative compatibility may be governed by the mating-type loci in some fungi, e.g. many basidiomycetes, but there also are examples in which a separate set of genes controls the fonnation and stability of these vegetative heterokaryons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.001015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 679

Metadata

Authors
Leslie, J. F.
Venue
Annual Review of Phytopathology
Published
1993-09
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
127-150
ISSN
  • 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2107
OpenAlex
W2149755404
Cited by
679
References
0
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal Vegetative Compatibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.001015
The paper
Leslie, J. F. (1993). Fungal Vegetative Compatibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.001015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.