Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality
Abstract
This chapter provides a general review of the research conducted over the past two decades on individuals’ conceptions of equity and distributive justice and their reactions to inequity. Various theoretical formulations are identified and important topics for further theoretical development and empirical investigation are discussed. In conclusion, the authors suggest that micro-level concepts of distributive justice have certain limitations. Consideration of more macrolevel concepts suggests possibilities for integrating equity and distributive justice theories with sociological theories of power, conflict, and collective action. This integration, if achieved, would bring notions of justice to the forefront in the analysis of social change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness.
“In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness (Cook & Hegtvedt, 1983;Jasso, 1983;Salganik et al., 2006).”
From Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests (2022) · cites this paper as Cook & Hegtvedt, 1983
Cites
Austin, W., McGinn, N. C., & Susmilch, C. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90049-9 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Buhaug, H. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139084161 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland
Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600903102949 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Hubbard, K. E. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01216-y · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests
Tsvetkova, M., Müller, S., Vuculescu, O., Ham, H., & Sergeev, R. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555649 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1983-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 217-241
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2170767625
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 32.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- distributive justice, equity, equality, conceptions of justice, theory of justice, power, social conflict, collective action, social change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review