Cited by 558Political Philosophy and EthicsSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality

Cook, Karen S., Hegtvedt, Karen A.·1983·Annual Review of Sociology

Abstract

This chapter provides a general review of the research conducted over the past two decades on individuals’ conceptions of equity and distributive justice and their reactions to inequity. Various theoretical formulations are identified and important topics for further theoretical development and empirical investigation are discussed. In conclusion, the authors suggest that micro-level concepts of distributive justice have certain limitations. Consideration of more macrolevel concepts suggests possibilities for integrating equity and distributive justice theories with sociological theories of power, conflict, and collective action. This integration, if achieved, would bring notions of justice to the forefront in the analysis of social change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.001245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness.

    “In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness (Cook & Hegtvedt, 1983;Jasso, 1983;Salganik et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
1983-08
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
217-241
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
OpenAlex
W2170767625
Cited by
558
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
32.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
distributive justice, equity, equality, conceptions of justice, theory of justice, power, social conflict, collective action, social change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review