The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Institutional Theories Of Organization
Abstract
The rapid growth of the platform economy has provoked scholarly discussion of its consequences for the nature of work and employment. We identify four major themes in the literature on platform work and the underlying metaphors associated with each. ...Read More
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259293 · Cited by 2,135
When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings
Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012181 · Cited by 853
Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., & Kadous, K. (2015) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12104 · Cited by 394
Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility in Host Countries: Does Distance Matter?
Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1928016 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Zucker, L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1987-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 443-464
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3150100371
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Institutional Theories Of Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.443
- The paper
- Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional Theories Of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
