Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Recombinant adeno-associated virus gene therapy in light of luxturna (and zolgensma and glybera): where are we, and how did we get here?

Open access
Keeler·2019·Annual Review of Virology

Abstract

The Annual Review of Virology communicates exciting advances in our understanding of viruses of animals, plants, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protozoa. Reviews highlight new ideas and directions in basic virology, viral disease mechanisms, virus-host interactions, and cellular and immune responses to virus infection, and reinforce the position of viruses as uniquely powerful probes of cellular function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/virology.2019.6.issue-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Keeler
Venue
Annual Review of Virology
Published
2019-09-29
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2327-056X (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0578
OpenAlex
W4248519378
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Virology (publishedVersion)
Keywords
animal viruses, plant viruses, bacterial viruses, archaeal viruses, host-virus interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review