Cited by 19Low-power high-performance VLSI designParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

IBM POWER7+ design for higher frequency at fixed power

Zyuban, V., Taylor, S. A., Christensen, B., Hall, A. R., Gonzalez, C. J., Friedrich, J., Clougherty, F., Tetzloff, J., Rao, R.·2013·IBM Journal of Research and Development

Abstract

The IBM POWER7+™ microprocessor is the next-generation IBM POWER® processor implemented in IBM's 32-nm silicon-on-insulator process. In addition to enhancing the chip functionality, implementing core-level and chiplet-level power gating and significantly increasing the size of the on-chip cache, the chip achieves a frequency boost of 15% to 25% compared with its predecessor at the same power. To achieve these challenging goals and deliver a serviceable power-frequency limited yield (PFLY), the IBM team made significant innovations in the post-silicon hardware-tuning methodology to counteract the inherent process variability and developed new PFLY models that account for several sources of variability in power and frequency. The paper describes the new methodology and the models, provides analysis of the sources of variability and their impact on power and frequency, and describes the work done to achieve correlation between the models and hardware measurements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1147/jrd.2013.2279597

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 45nm POWER7 processor had 32MB eDRAM LLC, the 32nm POWER7+ had 80MB eDRAM LLC, and the 22nm POWER8 has 96MB eDRAM LLC.

    “The 45nm POWER7 processor had 32MB eDRAM (embedded DRAM) LLC [Wendel et al. 2010], the 32nm POWER7+ processor had an 80MB eDRAM LLC [Zyuban et al. 2013], while the 22nm POWER8 processor has a 96MB eDRAM LLC [Fluhr et al. 2014].”

    From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Zyuban et al. 2013

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zyuban, V., Taylor, S. A., Christensen, B., Hall, A. R., Gonzalez, C. J., Friedrich, J., Clougherty, F., Tetzloff, J., & Rao, R.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • IBM (India) (IN)
ORCID
Rao, R.
Venue
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Publisher
IBM
Published
2013-11
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1:1-1:18
ISSN
0018-8646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046641658
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IBM Journal of Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Keywords
power gating, chiplets, on-chip cache, process variation, silicon-on-insulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review