Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Active Memory Cube: A processing-in-memory architecture for exascale systems

Nair, R., Antao, S. F., Bertolli, C., Bose, P., Brunheroto, J. R., Chen, T., Cher, C.-Y., Costa, C. H. A., Doi, J., Evangelinos, C., Fleischer, B. M., Fox, T. W., Gallo, D. S., Grinberg, L., Gunnels, J. A., Jacob, A. C., Jacob, P., Jacobson, H. M., Karkhanis, T., Kim, C., Moreno, J. H., O'Brien, J. K., Ohmacht, M., Park, Y., Prener, D. A., Rosenburg, B. S., Ryu, K. D., Sallenave, O., Serrano, M. J., Siegl, P. D. M., Sugavanam, K., Sura, Z.·2015·IBM Journal of Research and Development

Abstract

Many studies point to the difficulty of scaling existing computer architectures to meet the needs of an exascale system (i.e., capable of executing$10^{18} $floating-point operations per second), consuming no more than 20 MW in power, by around the year 2020. This paper outlines a new architecture, the Active Memory Cube, which reduces the energy of computation significantly by performing computation in the memory module, rather than moving data through large memory hierarchies to the processor core. The architecture leverages a commercially demonstrated 3D memory stack called the Hybrid Memory Cube, placing sophisticated computational elements on the logic layer below its stack of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) dies. The paper also describes an Active Memory Cube tuned to the requirements of a scientific exascale system. The computational elements have a vector architecture and are capable of performing a comprehensive set of floating-point and integer instructions, predicated operations, and gather-scatter accesses across memory in the Cube. The paper outlines the software infrastructure used to develop applications and to evaluate the architecture, and describes results of experiments on application kernels, along with performance and power projections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1147/jrd.2015.2409732

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Nair, R., Antao, S. F., Bertolli, C., Bose, P., Brunheroto, J. R., Chen, T., Cher, C.-Y., Costa, C. H. A., Doi, J., Evangelinos, C., Fleischer, B. M., Fox, T. W., Gallo, D. S., Grinberg, L., Gunnels, J. A., Jacob, A. C., Jacob, P., Jacobson, H. M., Karkhanis, T., Kim, C., Moreno, J. H., O'Brien, J. K., Ohmacht, M., Park, Y., Prener, D. A., Rosenburg, B. S., Ryu, K. D., Sallenave, O., Serrano, M. J., Siegl, P. D. M., Sugavanam, K., & Sura, Z.
Venue
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Publisher
IBM
Published
2015-03
Volume
59
Issue
2/3
Pages
17:1-17:14
ISSN
0018-8646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093524602
Cited by
186
References
0
FWCI
42.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active Memory Cube: A processing-in-memory architecture for exascale systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1147/jrd.2015.2409732
The paper
Nair, R., Antao, S. F., Bertolli, C., Bose, P., Brunheroto, J. R., Chen, T., Cher, C.-Y., Costa, C. H. A., Doi, J., Evangelinos, C., Fleischer, B. M., Fox, T. W., Gallo, D. S., Grinberg, L., Gunnels, J. A., Jacob, A. C., Jacob, P., Jacobson, H. M., Karkhanis, T., . . . Sura, Z. (2015). Active Memory Cube: A processing-in-memory architecture for exascale systems. IBM Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1147/jrd.2015.2409732

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.