The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Collaborative Enterprise for Multi-Stakeholder Participation in the Advancement of Quantitative Imaging
Abstract
Medical imaging has seen substantial and rapid technical advances during the past decade, including advances in image acquisition devices, processing and analysis software, and agents to enhance specificity. Traditionally, medical imaging has defined anatomy, but increasingly newer, more advanced, imaging technologies provide biochemical and physiologic information based on both static and dynamic modalities. These advanced technologies are important not only for detecting disease but for characterizing and assessing change of disease with time or therapy. Because of the rapidity of these advances, research to determine the utility of quantitative imaging in either clinical research or clinical practice has not had time to mature. Methods to appropriately develop, assess, regulate, and reimburse must be established for these advanced technologies. Efficient and methodical processes that meet the needs of stakeholders in the biomedical research community, therapeutics developers, and health care delivery enterprises will ultimately benefit individual patients. To help address this, the authors formed a collaborative program-the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance. This program draws from the very successful precedent set by the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise effort but is adapted to the needs of imaging science. Strategic guidance supporting the development, qualification, and deployment of quantitative imaging biomarkers will lead to improved standardization of imaging tests, proof of imaging test performance, and greater use of imaging to predict the biologic behavior of tissue and monitor therapy response. These, in turn, confer value to corporate stakeholders, providing incentives to bring new and innovative products to market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hua, X., Lee, S., Yanovsky, I., Leow, A. D., Chou, Y.-Y., Ho, A. J., Gutman, B., Toga, A. W., Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., et al. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.011 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review
Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631 · Cited by 669
Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer
Parmar, C., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Grossmann, P., Rios Velazquez, E., Bussink, J., Rietveld, D., Rietbergen, M. M., Haibe-Kains, B., Lambin, P., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11044 · Cited by 434
Larue, R. T. H. M., Defraene, G., De Ruysscher, D., Lambin, P., & van Elmpt, W. (2017) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20160665 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckler, A. J., Bresolin, L., Dunnick, N. R., Sullivan, D. C., & For the Group
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 906-914
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2114588884
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Collaborative Enterprise for Multi-Stakeholder Participation in the Advancement of Quantitative Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.10100799
- The paper
- Buckler, A. J., Bresolin, L., Dunnick, N. R., Sullivan, D. C., & For the Group. (2011). A Collaborative Enterprise for Multi-Stakeholder Participation in the Advancement of Quantitative Imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.