Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 845

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses

Berg, Wendie A., Cosgrove, David O., Doré, Caroline J, Schäfer, Fritz K. W., Svensson, William E., Hooley, Regina J., Ohlinger, Ralf, Mendelson, Ellen B., Balu-Maestro, Catherine, Locatelli, Martina, Tourasse, Christophe, Cavanaugh, Barbara C., Juhan, Valérie, Stavros, A. Thomas, Tardivon, Anne, Gay, Joel, Henry, Jean-Pierre, Cohen-Bacrie, Claude, For the BE1 Investigators·2012·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether adding shear-wave (SW) elastographic features could improve accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) assessment of breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2008 to September 2010, 958 women consented to repeat standard breast US supplemented by quantitative SW elastographic examination in this prospective multicenter institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol. B-mode Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) features and assessments were recorded. SW elastographic evaluation (mean, maximum, and minimum elasticity of stiffest portion of mass and surrounding tissue; lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio; ratio of SW elastographic-to-B-mode lesion diameter or area; SW elastographic lesion shape and homogeneity) was performed. Qualitative color SW elastographic stiffness was assessed independently. Nine hundred thirty-nine masses were analyzable; 102 BI-RADS category 2 masses were assumed to be benign; reference standard was available for 837 category 3 or higher lesions. Considering BI-RADS category 4a or higher as test positive for malignancy, effect of SW elastographic features on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity after reclassifying category 3 and 4a masses was determined. RESULTS: Median participant age was 50 years; 289 of 939 (30.8%) masses were malignant (median mass size, 12 mm). B-mode BI-RADS AUC was 0.950; eight of 303 (2.6%) BI-RADS category 3 masses, 18 of 193 (9.3%) category 4a lesions, 41 of 97 (42%) category 4b lesions, 42 of 57 (74%) category 4c lesions, and 180 of 187 (96.3%) category 5 lesions were malignant. By using visual color stiffness to selectively upgrade category 3 and lack of stiffness to downgrade category 4a masses, specificity improved from 61.1% (397 of 650) to 78.5% (510 of 650) (P<.001); AUC increased to 0.962 (P=.005). Oval shape on SW elastographic images and quantitative maximum elasticity of 80 kPa (5.2 m/sec) or less improved specificity (69.4% [451 of 650] and 77.4% [503 of 650], P<.001 for both), without significant improvement in sensitivity or AUC. CONCLUSION: Adding SW elastographic features to BI-RADS feature analysis improved specificity of breast US mass assessment without loss of sensitivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.11110640

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 845

Metadata

Authors
Berg, W. A., Cosgrove, D. O., Doré, C. J., Schäfer, F. K. W., Svensson, W. E., Hooley, R. J., Ohlinger, R., Mendelson, E. B., Balu-Maestro, C., Locatelli, M., Tourasse, C., Cavanaugh, B. C., Juhan, V., Stavros, A. T., Tardivon, A., Gay, J., Henry, J.-P., Cohen-Bacrie, C., & For the BE1 Investigators
Venue
Radiology
Published
2012-02
Volume
262
Issue
2
Pages
435-449
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2161349414
Cited by
845
References
0
FWCI
50.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.11110640
The paper
Berg, W. A., Cosgrove, D. O., Doré, C. J., Schäfer, F. K. W., Svensson, W. E., Hooley, R. J., Ohlinger, R., Mendelson, E. B., Balu-Maestro, C., Locatelli, M., Tourasse, C., Cavanaugh, B. C., Juhan, V., Stavros, A. T., Tardivon, A., Gay, J., Henry, J.-P., Cohen-Bacrie, C., & For the BE1 Investigators. (2012). Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110640

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.