Working memory in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: functional MR imaging analysis
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze brain activation patterns in response to tests of working memory after a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. Brain activation patterns in response to n-back working memory tasks (n = 1, 2, 3) were assessed with functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in 20 patients with MTBI within 1 month after their injury and in 18 healthy control subjects. In n-back working memory tasks, participants monitored a series of number stimuli and were to indicate when the presented number was the same as that presented n back previously. Nine (45%) MTBI patients underwent follow-up functional MR imaging studies 6 weeks later. Digit span, a memory test for how many numbers a person can remember in sequence, and continuous performance test (CPT), a test that measures a person's sustained and selective attention and impulsivity, were also performed before functional MR imaging studies and outside the imager for each participant. Clinical data were analyzed by using t and χ(2) tests. Within-group, between-group, and initial and follow-up differences of functional MR imaging data were analyzed by using one-sample, two-sample, and paired t tests, respectively. RESULTS: Groups were similar for sex (P = .75), years of education (P = .069), digit span (P = .37 for total score), CPT (P = .31, .27, and .43 for omission error, commission error, and hit reaction time, respecti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In response to increased working memory load, mTBI participants show increased activation outside typical working memory circuitry, suggesting recruitment of additional resources as a possible compensatory response.
“In response to increased working memory load, mTBI participants have been shown to increase activation in areas outside typical working memory circuity, suggesting recruitment of additional resources as a possible compensatory response post-injury (Chen et al., 2012;Hillary, 2008).”
From Investigation of neurobiological responses to theta burst stimulation during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Chen, C.-J., Wu, C.-H., Liao, Y.-P., Hsu, H.-L., Tseng, Y.-C., Liu, H.-L., & Chiu, W.-T.
- Affiliations
- Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
- Chang Gung University (TW)
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 844-851
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2089620859
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, working memory, n-back task, brain activation patterns, working memory load, neuroplasticity, functional recovery, digit span, continuous performance test, attention, impulsivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Glasgow Coma Scale, Chi-Square Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review