The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate MR Images: Differentiation between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue and Correlation with Gleason Score—A Computer-aided Diagnosis Development Study
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential utility of a number of parameters obtained at T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast material-enhanced multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of prostate cancer and assessment of cancer aggressiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant study, multiparametric MR images were acquired with an endorectal coil in 48 patients with prostate cancer (median age, 62.5 years; age range, 44-73 years) who subsequently underwent prostatectomy. A radiologist and a pathologist identified 104 regions of interest (ROIs) (61 cancer ROIs, 43 normal ROIs) based on correlation of histologic and MR findings. The 10th percentile and average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, T2-weighted signal intensity histogram skewness, and Tofts K(trans) were analyzed, both individually and combined, via linear discriminant analysis, with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) as figure of merit, to distinguish cancer foci from normal foci. Spearman rank-order correlation (ρ) was calculated between cancer foci Gleason score (GS) and image features. RESULTS: AUC (maximum likelihood estimate ± standard error) values in the differentiation of prostate cancer from normal foci of 10th percentile ADC, average ADC, T2-weighted skewness, and K(trans) were 0.92 ± 0.03, 0.89 ± 0.03, 0.86 ± 0.04, and 0.69 ± 0.04, respectively. The combination of 10th percentile ADC, average ADC, and T2-weighted skewness yielded an AUC value for the same task of 0.95 ± 0.02. GS correlated moderately with 10th percentile ADC (ρ = -0.34, P = .008), average ADC (ρ = -0.30, P = .02), and K(trans) (ρ = 0.38, P = .004). CONCLUSION: The combination of 10th percentile ADC, average ADC, and T2-weighted skewness with CAD is promising in the differentiation of prostate cancer from normal tissue. ADC image features and K(trans) moderately correlate with GS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20138 · Cited by 10,679
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Cited by
Wibmer, A., Hricak, H., Gondo, T., Matsumoto, K., Veeraraghavan, H., Fehr, D., Zheng, J., Goldman, D., Moskowitz, C., Fine, S. W., et al. (2015) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8 · Cited by 391
Gnep, K., Fargeas, A., Gutiérrez-Carvajal, R. E., Commandeur, F., Mathieu, R., Ospina, J. D., Rolland, Y., Rohou, T., Vincendeau, S., Hatt, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.25335 · Cited by 162
Vignati, A., Mazzetti, S., Giannini, V, Russo, F., Bollito, E., Porpiglia, F., Stasi, M., & Regge, D. (2015) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/2685 · Cited by 122
Deep Learning Role in Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Reda, I., Khalil, A., Elmogy, M., Abou El-Fetouh, A., Shalaby, A., Abou El-Ghar, M., Elmaghraby, A., Ghazal, M., & El-Baz, A. (2018) · Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · doi:10.1177/1533034618775530 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, C., Brown, J. B., Antic, T., Sethi, I., Schmid-Tannwald, C., Giger, M. L., Eggener, S. E., & Oto, A.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-796
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2112224175
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate MR Images: Differentiation between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue and Correlation with Gleason Score—A Computer-aided Diagnosis Development Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.13121454
- The paper
- Peng, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, C., Brown, J. B., Antic, T., Sethi, I., Schmid-Tannwald, C., Giger, M. L., Eggener, S. E., & Oto, A. (2013). Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate MR Images: Differentiation between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue and Correlation with Gleason Score—A Computer-aided Diagnosis Development Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.