Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds

Open access
Yankelevitz, David F., Yip, Rowena, Smith, James P., Liang, Mingzhu, Liu, Ying, Xu, Dong Ming, Salvatore, Mary M., Wolf, Andrea S., Flores, Raja M., Henschke, Claudia I., As the Writing Committee for The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators Group·2015·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To address the frequency of identifying nonsolid nodules, diagnosing lung cancer manifesting as such nodules, and the long-term outcome after treatment in a prospective cohort, the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57,496 participants underwent baseline and subsequent annual repeat computed tomographic (CT) screenings according to an institutional review board, HIPAA-compliant protocol. Informed consent was obtained. The frequency of participants with nonsolid nodules, the course of the nodule at follow-up, and the resulting diagnoses of lung cancer, treatment, and outcome are given separately for baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening. The χ(2) statistic was used to compare percentages. RESULTS: A nonsolid nodule was identified in 2392 (4.2%) of 57,496 baseline screenings, and pathologic pursuit led to the diagnosis of 73 cases of adenocarcinoma. A new nonsolid nodule was identified in 485 (0.7%) of 64,677 annual repeat screenings, and 11 had a diagnosis of stage I adenocarcinoma; none were in nodules 15 mm or larger in diameter. Nonsolid nodules resolved or decreased more frequently in annual repeat than in baseline rounds (322 [66%] of 485 vs 628 [26%] of 2392, P < .0001). Treatment of the cases of lung cancer was with lobectomy in 55, bilobectomy in two, sublobar resection in 26, and radiation therapy in one. Median time to treatment was 19 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-41 months). A solid component had developed in 22 cases prior to treatment (median transition time from nonsolid to part-solid, 25 months). The lung cancer-survival rate was 100% with median follow-up since diagnosis of 78 months (IQR, 45-122 months). CONCLUSION: Nonsolid nodules of any size can be safely followed with CT at 12-month intervals to assess transition to part-solid. Surgery was 100% curative in all cases, regardless of the time to treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2015142554

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Yankelevitz, D. F., Yip, R., Smith, J. P., Liang, M., Liu, Y., Xu, D. M., Salvatore, M. M., Wolf, A. S., Flores, R. M., Henschke, C. I., & As the Writing Committee for The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators Group
Venue
Radiology
Published
2015-11
Volume
277
Issue
2
Pages
555-564
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W1925282974
Cited by
255
References
0
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2015142554
The paper
Yankelevitz, D. F., Yip, R., Smith, J. P., Liang, M., Liu, Y., Xu, D. M., Salvatore, M. M., Wolf, A. S., Flores, R. M., Henschke, C. I., & As the Writing Committee for The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators Group. (2015). CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142554

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.