The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To address the frequency of identifying nonsolid nodules, diagnosing lung cancer manifesting as such nodules, and the long-term outcome after treatment in a prospective cohort, the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57,496 participants underwent baseline and subsequent annual repeat computed tomographic (CT) screenings according to an institutional review board, HIPAA-compliant protocol. Informed consent was obtained. The frequency of participants with nonsolid nodules, the course of the nodule at follow-up, and the resulting diagnoses of lung cancer, treatment, and outcome are given separately for baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening. The χ(2) statistic was used to compare percentages. RESULTS: A nonsolid nodule was identified in 2392 (4.2%) of 57,496 baseline screenings, and pathologic pursuit led to the diagnosis of 73 cases of adenocarcinoma. A new nonsolid nodule was identified in 485 (0.7%) of 64,677 annual repeat screenings, and 11 had a diagnosis of stage I adenocarcinoma; none were in nodules 15 mm or larger in diameter. Nonsolid nodules resolved or decreased more frequently in annual repeat than in baseline rounds (322 [66%] of 485 vs 628 [26%] of 2392, P < .0001). Treatment of the cases of lung cancer was with lobectomy in 55, bilobectomy in two, sublobar resection in 26, and radiation therapy in one. Median time to treatment was 19 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-41 months). A solid component had developed in 22 cases prior to treatment (median transition time from nonsolid to part-solid, 25 months). The lung cancer-survival rate was 100% with median follow-up since diagnosis of 78 months (IQR, 45-122 months). CONCLUSION: Nonsolid nodules of any size can be safely followed with CT at 12-month intervals to assess transition to part-solid. Surgery was 100% curative in all cases, regardless of the time to treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MacMahon, H., Naidich, D. P., Goo, J. M., Lee, K. S., Leung, A. N. C., Mayo, J. R., Mehta, A. C., Ohno, Y., Powell, C. A., Prokop, M., et al. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659 · Cited by 2,491
Scientific Advances in Lung Cancer 2015
Tsao, A. S., Scagliotti, G. V., Bunn, P. A., Carbone, D. P., Warren, G. W., Bai, C., de Koning, H. J., Yousaf-Khan, A. U., McWilliams, A., Tsao, M. S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.012 · Cited by 284
Lung Cancer Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries
Jiwnani, S., Penumadu, P., Ashok, A., & Pramesh, C. S. (2022) · Thoracic Surgery Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.04.005 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Yankelevitz, D. F., Yip, R., Smith, J. P., Liang, M., Liu, Y., Xu, D. M., Salvatore, M. M., Wolf, A. S., Flores, R. M., Henschke, C. I., & As the Writing Committee for The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators Group
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-564
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1925282974
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2015142554
- The paper
- Yankelevitz, D. F., Yip, R., Smith, J. P., Liang, M., Liu, Y., Xu, D. M., Salvatore, M. M., Wolf, A. S., Flores, R. M., Henschke, C. I., & As the Writing Committee for The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators Group. (2015). CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.