Cited by 242Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Dual-Energy CT for the Musculoskeletal System

Mallinson, Paul I., Coupal, Tyler M., McLaughlin, Patrick D., Nicolaou, Savvas, Munk, Peter L., Ouellette, Hugue A.·2016·Radiology

Abstract

The principal advantages of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) over conventional CT in the musculoskeletal setting relate to the additional information provided regarding tissue composition, artifact reduction, and image optimization. This article discusses the manifestations of these in clinical practice-urate and bone marrow edema detection, metal artifact reduction, and tendon analysis, with potential in arthrography, bone densitometry, and metastases surveillance. The basic principles of dual-energy CT physics and scanner design will also be discussed. © RSNA, 2016.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2016151109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DECT uses virtual non-calcium imaging to enable material breakdown and visualization of bone marrow edema-like signal intensity.

    “While conventional CT emphasizes subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes, and cysts, DECT uses virtual non-calcium imaging to enable the material breakdown and visualization of bone marrow edema-like signal intensity (ELMSI) [75].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 122 · Cited by 242

Authors
Mallinson, P. I., Coupal, T. M., McLaughlin, P. D., Nicolaou, S., Munk, P. L., & Ouellette, H. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2016-12
Volume
281
Issue
3
Pages
690-707
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2551262871
Cited by
242
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
dual-energy CT, musculoskeletal imaging, bone marrow edema, metal artifact reduction, tendon imaging, arthrography, bone densitometry, CT scanner design, tissue composition
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arthrography, Bone Marrow Diseases, Collagen, Edema, Female, Gout, Humans, Intervertebral Disc, Ligaments, Male, Metals, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Musculoskeletal System, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Uric Acid, Bone Density, Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review