The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop
Open accessAbstract
Imaging research laboratories are rapidly creating machine learning systems that achieve expert human performance using open-source methods and tools. These artificial intelligence systems are being developed to improve medical image reconstruction, noise reduction, quality assurance, triage, segmentation, computer-aided detection, computer-aided classification, and radiogenomics. In August 2018, a meeting was held in Bethesda, Maryland, at the National Institutes of Health to discuss the current state of the art and knowledge gaps and to develop a roadmap for future research initiatives. Key research priorities include: 1, new image reconstruction methods that efficiently produce images suitable for human interpretation from source data; 2, automated image labeling and annotation methods, including information extraction from the imaging report, electronic phenotyping, and prospective structured image reporting; 3, new machine learning methods for clinical imaging data, such as tailored, pretrained model architectures, and federated machine learning methods; 4, machine learning methods that can explain the advice they provide to human users (so-called explainable artificial intelligence); and 5, validated methods for image de-identification and data sharing to facilitate wide availability of clinical imaging data sets. This research roadmap is intended to identify and prioritize these needs for academic research laboratories, funding agencies, professional societies, and industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The problem is exacerbated by issues related to interobserver and intraobserver variability of CT image interpretations rendered by radiologists, which can be as high as 37%.206”
From Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [206]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“This was largely due to advances in deep learning, the branch of AI that learns from large amounts of data.”
From Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“In 2015, the ImageNet annual competition reached a milestone when the error rate of automatic classification of images dropped below 5%, which is the average human error rate (Figure S1) 17 .”
From Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,989
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Suykens, J., & Vandewalle, J. (1999) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1018628609742 · Cited by 9,481
Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- National Academy of Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.
- Prior FW, 2013, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2013, 1282
- Yan K, 2018, J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 5, 036501
- Banda JM, 2017, AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc, 2017, 48
- Wiley LK, 2015, AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc, 2015, 466
- Aronson AR, 2001, Proc AMIA Symp, 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 4,015
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI
Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314 · Cited by 2,524
Ahmed, Z., Mohamed, K., Zeeshan, S., & Dong, X. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa010 · Cited by 1,035
Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning
Willemink, M. J., Koszek, W. A., Hardell, C., Wu, J., Fleischmann, D., Harvey, H., Folio, L. R., Summers, R. M., Rubin, D. L., & Lungren, M. P. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192224 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationYang, G., Ye, Q., & Xia, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.016 · Cited by 717
Metadata
- Authors
- Langlotz, C. P., Allen, B., Erickson, B. J., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Bigelow, K., Cook, T. S., Flanders, A. E., Lungren, M. P., Mendelson, D. S., Rudie, J. D., Wang, G., & Kandarpa, K.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 781-791
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- PMC
- PMC6542624
- OpenAlex
- W2939071985
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 17
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in medical imaging, research priorities, image reconstruction, image segmentation, computer-aided detection, computer-aided classification, radiogenomics, automatic image annotation, electronic phenotyping, federated learning, pre-trained models, explainable AI
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
