The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Liver Fat Content with CT and MRI: State of the Art
Open accessAbstract
Hepatic steatosis is defined as pathologically elevated liver fat content and has many underlying causes. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, with an increasing prevalence among adults and children. Abnormal liver fat accumulation has serious consequences, including cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, hepatic steatosis is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and, most important, cardiovascular mortality. During the past 2 decades, noninvasive imaging-based methods for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis have been developed and disseminated. Chemical shift-encoded MRI is now established as the most accurate and precise method for liver fat quantification. CT is important for the detection and quantification of incidental steatosis and may play an increasingly prominent role in risk stratification, particularly with the emergence of CT-based screening and artificial intelligence. Quantitative imaging methods are increasingly used for diagnostic work-up and management of steatosis, including treatment monitoring. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide an overview of recent progress and current state of the art for liver fat quantification using CT and MRI, as well as important practical considerations related to clinical implementation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MRI can be used to quantify the triglyceride content (usually expressed as proton density fat fraction [PDFF]) in the liver and is the non-invasive gold standard for hepatic lipid quanti fi cation in MASLD.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [162]
In the citing paper
“While CT scans obtained in clinical routine (usually performed for other purposes) can provide a rough estimate of liver steatosis and thereby suggest SLD, 162 this method is not suitable for proper assessment of steatosis.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [162]
Citations
Cites
Younossi, Z. M., Koenig, A. B., Abdelatif, D., Fazel, Y., Henry, L., & Wymer, M. (2016) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28431 · Cited by 10,781
Chalasani, N., Younossi, Z., Lavine, J. E., Charlton, M., Cusi, K., Rinella, M., Harrison, S. A., Brunt, E. M., & Sanyal, A. J. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29367 · Cited by 7,239
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Proposal for Grading and Staging The Histological Lesions
Brunt, E. M., Janney, C. G., Di Bisceglie, A. M., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., & Bacon, B. R. (1999) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01377.x · Cited by 3,907
MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease
Eslam, M., Sanyal, A. J., George, J., Sanyal, A., Neuschwander-Tetri, B., Tiribelli, C., Kleiner, D. E., Brunt, E., Bugianesi, E., Yki-Järvinen, H., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312 · Cited by 3,286
Estes, C., Razavi, H. A., Loomba, R. S., Younossi, Z. M., & Sanyal, A. J. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29466 · Cited by 2,496
The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Saadeh, S. N., Younossi, Z. M., Remer, E. M., Gramlich, T., Ong, J. P., Hurley, M. E., Mullen, K. D., Cooper, J. N., & Sheridan, M. J. (2002) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2002.35354 · Cited by 2,112
Sampling Variability of Liver Biopsy in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Ratziu, V., Charlotte, F., Heurtier, A., Gombert, S., Giral, P., Bruckert, E., Grimaldi, A., Capron, F., & Poynard, T. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084 · Cited by 2,106
Szczepaniak, L. S., Nurenberg, P., Leonard, D. S., Browning, J. D., Reingold, J. S., Grundy, S. M., Hobbs, H. H., & Dobbins, R. L. (2004) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00064.2004 · Cited by 1,573
Prevalence of Fatty Liver in Children and Adolescents
Schwimmer, J. B., Deutsch, R., Kahen, T., Lavine, J. E., Stanley, C. R., & Behling, C. A. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1212 · Cited by 1,477
Adinolfi, L. E., Gambardella, M., Andreana, A., Tripodi, M., Utili, R., & Ruggiero, G. (2001) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.24432 · Cited by 1,052
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bush EC, 2018, J Vis Exp, 2018, 9
- Chen X, 2017, Eur J Radiol, 94, 179
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 321
Golub, I. S., Manubolu, V. S., Aldana-Bitar, J., Dahal, S., Verghese, D., Alalawi, L. H., Krishnan, S., Kianoush, S., Benzing, T., Ichikawa, K., et al. (2025) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2025.104036 · Cited by 10
Reeder, S. B., & Starekova, J. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.232552 · Cited by 7
El‐Kassas, M., Othman, H. A., Elbadry, M., Alswat, K., & Yilmaz, Y. N. (2024) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102415 · Cited by 6
Advanced Imaging Techniques for Assessing Fat, Iron, and Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Disease
Narayanasamy, S., França, M., İdilman, İ. S., Yin, M., & Venkatesh, S. K. (2025) · Gut and Liver · doi:10.5009/gnl240302 · Cited by 6
Kong, Q., Kong, D., Li, B., Peng, W., & Chen, Z. (2025) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.003 · Cited by 8
Hou, M., Zhu, Y., Zhou, H., Zhou, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. (2025) · Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10238-025-01818-5 · Cited by 7
“Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as a noninvasive imaging modality, has been widely utilized in recent years for the diagnosis and evaluation of liver diseases [16–18].”
Nabi, O., Spaak, J., Bergström, G. M. L., Engström, G., Östgren, C. J., Malinovschi, A., Kullberg, J., Blomberg, A., Jernberg, T., Andersson, D. P., et al. (2026) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.70071 · Cited by 7
CT-based Opportunistic Screening for Adding Clinical Value: How I Do It
Pickhardt, P. J., Lee, M. V., Warner, J., Summers, R. M., & Garrett, J. W. (2026) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.252106 · Cited by 6
Evolutive Models, Algorithms and Predictive Parameters for the Progression of Hepatic Steatosis
Tudor, M. S., Gheorman, V., Simeanu, G.-M. C., Dobrinescu, A., Pădureanu, V., Dinescu, V. C., & Forțofoiu, M.-C. (2024) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo14040198 · Cited by 5
“MRI is especially advantageous in differentiating hepatic steatosis from other liver diseases and can provide accurate assessments of fat distribution within the liver [16].”
BackgroundZhang, W., Fu, C., Dong, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, W., Gu, D., Wu, Y., Zhang, D., Wang, L., & Cheng, X. (2024) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-24-127 · Cited by 6
“While multiple studies have reported on PDFF accuracy in the liver, in-depth discussions on Dixon PDFF in the muscle domain remain limited (22,23,39).”
Gomes, N. B. N., Torres, U. S., Caiado, Â. H. M., Fucuta, P. D. S., Ferraz, M. L. G., & D’Ippolito, G. (2024) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-024-01863-2 · Cited by 6
“The classification adopted for the grading of the fat fraction by the PDFF method and the spectroscopic method was as follows [35]: Grade 0 (Normal) < 5%; Grade I (Mild) > 5–15%; Grade II (Moderate) > 15–25%; and Grade III (Severe) > 25%.”
Toia, G. V., Garret, J. W., Rose, S. D., Szczykutowicz, T. P., & Pickhardt, P. J. (2024) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04733-7 · Cited by 6
“Opportunistic screening is a subcategory of quantitative decrease in fat biomarker attenuation can be explained by fat’s lower attenuation coefficient relative to water [54 ].”
Ringe, K. I., & Yoon, J. H. (2023) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2022.0838 · Cited by 6
“Based on R2* measurements, fat-corrected R2*maps are a by-product of multi-echo CSE acquisitions used to create R2*-corrected PDFF maps [11].”
MethodSun, Y., Qi, X., Wang, X., Lin, X., Zhou, Y., Du, Y., Liu, A., Lv, X., Zhou, J., Li, Z., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003803 · Cited by 6
“Abnormal hepatic fat accumulation may lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma [9].”
BackgroundKan, R., Wang, S., Meng, X., Guo, Y., Li, D., & Yu, X. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01995-z · Cited by 6
“…biomarkers of liver injury, specifically changes in Liver Steatosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) [20], alterations in Liver Stiffness measured via magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kPa, as well as changes in the Fibrosis Test Score (FTS)…”
Mahmood, M. T., Fadil, A., Nassrullah, H. A. A., Ahmed, S., Mhmood, S. M., Mohammed, Z. I., Ahmed, S. R., & Shin, J. (2025) · International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR) · doi:10.1109/iccr67387.2025.11292200 · Cited by 5
Lou, J.-J., & Zeng, J. (2025) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i47.111900 · Cited by 8
“Routine screening relies on serologic markers, risk scores, and imaging [ e.g. , ultrasound, computed tomography (CT)], which have limited sensitivity for mild steatosis and early fibrosis and are affected by operator and equipment variability[13-15].”
Kim, J. Y., Lee, E. J., Yoon, H., Han, K., Kwon, Y., Koh, H., Kim, Y. W., & Lee, M.-J. (2026) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.25.34230 · Cited by 5
Liu, M., Ma, Y., Cheang, W. S., Su, Z., & Xu, S. (2026) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2026.04.011 · Cited by 8
FedIOD: Federated Multi-Organ Segmentation From Partial Labels by Exploring Inter-Organ Dependency
Wan, 秦. Q., Yan, Z., & Yu, L. C. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3381844 · Cited by 5
Zhang, X., Bao, S., Wang, M., Xu, Z., Yan, F., & Yang, W. (2024) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111545 · Cited by 5
Alshoabi, S. A., Alharbi, R. M., Algohani, R. B., Al-Ahmadi, S., Ahmed, M., Faqeeh, S., Alahmadi, D., Qurashi, A. A., Alhazmi, F. H., Alrehaili, R. M., et al. (2024) · Gastroenterology Insights · doi:10.3390/gastroent15030043 · Cited by 5
Ma, M., Cheng, J., Li, X., Fan, Z., Wang, C., Reeder, S. B., & Hernando, D. (2024) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.5274 · Cited by 5
Mishra, P., Sadananthan, S. A., Yaligar, J., Tan, K. H., Chong, Y. S., Gluckman, P. D., Godfrey, K. M., Fortier, M. V., Eriksson, J. G., Chan, J. K. Y., et al. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03779-0 · Cited by 5
Naghavi, M., Atlas, K. C., Reeves, A. P., Zhang, C., Wasserthal, J., Atlas, T. L., Henschke, C. I., Yankelevitz, D. F., Zulueta, J. J., Budoff, M. J., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004760 · Cited by 5
“7 Although liver biopsy and MRI provide the most sensitive and accurate quantitation of liver fat, 7 they are not suitable as an opportunistic screening tool for quantification of liver fat.”
Optimized motion‐insensitive PDFF mapping of the liver
Tang, J., Tamada, D., Souza, R. D. V., Faacks, A., Starekova, J., Heidenreich, J. F., Müller, L., Fullerton, G. C., Buelo, C. J., Kammerman, J., et al. (2025) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.70047 · Cited by 5
Mao, Z., Gao, Z., Ji, T. Z., Huan, S., Yin, G.-P., & Chen, L. (2024) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s12944-024-02043-x · Cited by 6
“We used genetic tools for liver fat and liver volume to represent the liver health status in NAFLD [28, 29].”
BackgroundMethodPractical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children
Kemp, J. M., Ghosh, A., Dillman, J. R., Krishnasarma, R., Manhard, M. K., Tipirneni‐Sajja, A., Shrestha, U., Trout, A. T., & Morin, C. E. (2025) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-024-06133-x · Cited by 5
Wilson, M. P., Tang, A., Low, G., Zhang, L. X., Costa, A. F., Pang, E., Chang, S. D., Medellin, A., Shaheen, A. A., Dana, J., et al. (2025) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1177/08465371251357444 · Cited by 6
Hong, S. B., Lee, N. K., Kim, S., Um, K., Kim, K., & Kim, I. J. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58101459 · Cited by 5
“NAFLD is projected to become the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States over the next decade [3].”
MethodInfluentialZifan, A., Zhao, K., Lee, M., Peng, Z., Roney, L., Pai, S., Weeks, J. T., Middleton, M. S., Kaffas, A. E., Schwimmer, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15020117 · Cited by 4
“…fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) is widely recognized as the non-invasive reference standard to assess hepatic steatosis, the hallmark feature of MASLD [6,7]; however, its availability is limited due to its infrastructure requirements, and costs [8], especially in resource-limited regions worldwide.”
Imaging in patients with obesity: challenges, applications and future directions
Tordjman, M., Fayad, Z. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Trivieri, M. G., Bansal, M. B., Srinath, R., & Taouli, B. A. (2025) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-025-01166-0 · Cited by 4
In Situ Lipoprotein‐seeking Dye for in Vivo Real‐Time Imaging of Lipid Dysregulation Diseases
Du, Y., Dang, Z., Xu, B., Xu, J., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, S. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202514290 · Cited by 4
Han, J. M., Cho, J. H., Kim, H. I., Suh, S., Lee, Y., Lee, J. W., Kim, K. M., & Bae, J. C. (2023) · Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.3803/enm.2023.1729 · Cited by 4
“We used a mean liver attenuation cut-off value of 57 HU on unenhanced CT for mild hepatic steatosis (corresponding to hepatic fat contents ≥5%) and 40 HU for moderate to severe hepatic steatosis (corresponding to hepatic fat contents ≥30%) [10,14-16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJang, H. J., Jang, J. K., Heo, S., Koo, B., Song, I. H., Park, H. J., Yoon, S., & Kim, S. Y. (2025) · ULTRASONOGRAPHY · doi:10.14366/usg.24223 · Cited by 4
“The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age between 18 and 80 years, (2) body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m 2 , and (3) suspected hepatic steatosis on imaging examinations such as ultrasound, computed tomography, or MRI [3,20,21].”
Keinosuke, I., Fujita, H., Kimura, N., Nagase, H., Wakasa, Y., Tsuruta, S., Muroya, T., & Hakamada, K. (2025) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000002508 · Cited by 4
“25,36 However, few reports have evaluated pancreatic fat, and no standardized method has been established.”
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and spleen in Gaucher disease
Parente, D. B., Malta, F. C. M. D. M., Cravo, R., Luiz, R. R., Rotman, V., Perez, R. D. M., & Rodrigues, R. S. (2024) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04293-w · Cited by 4
“Additionally, MR elastography (MRE) can assess liver and spleen stiffness [15–18].”
Oh, C., Bang, J.-I., Lee, S. Y., Lee, J. K., Chai, J. W., & Oh, S. W. (2024) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2024.0057 · Cited by 4
“Low HU values have been shown to correlate significantly with intracellular lipid accumulation in organs such as muscle [19] and liver [20].”
Automated Quantitative Evaluation of Age-Related Thymic Involution on Plain Chest CT
Okamura, Y. T., Endo, K., Toriihara, A., Fukuda, I., Isogai, J., Sato, Y., Yasuoka, K., & Kagami, S. (2025) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-025-03805-z · Cited by 4
“…percentage of one tissue mixed with another tissue from voxel values (partial volume estimation), similar to what we do in the ETV calculation, has been used in applications such as assessing adipose tissue percentage in fatty liver [31] and improving volume measurements of brain compartments [32].”
Yi, J., Patel, K., Miller, R. J. H., Marcinkiewicz, A. M., Shanbhag, A. D., Hijazi, W., Dharmavaram, N. L., Lemley, M. H., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157 · Cited by 4
Lee, H., Bae, H., Yoon, J. K., Park, J., & Chung, Y. E. (2024) · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.13104/imri.2023.0020 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of photon-counting CT-derived attenuation parameters for noninvasive liver fat assessment
Shu, D., Wang, J., Ding, L., Zhao, Z., & Yang, J. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112354 · Cited by 3
Dote‐Montero, M., Clavero‐Jimeno, A., Cortés‐Martín, A., López-Pascual, A., Merchán-Ramírez, E., Camacho-Cardeñosa, A., Alavarez, M. C., Osés, M., López-Vázquez, A., Amaro‐Gahete, F. J., et al. (2026) · JHEP Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101956 · Cited by 4
Imagerie opportuniste : un nouvel outil pour une politique de santé préventive
Larédo, J.-D. (2023) · Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine · doi:10.1016/j.banm.2023.07.017 · Cited by 3
Björnson, E., Samaras, D., Levin, M. C., Bäckhed, F., Bergström, G. M. L., & Gummesson, A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73406-8 · Cited by 3
El-Sabawi, B. R., Tanrıverdi, K., Gajjar, P., Nayor, M. G., Landman, J. M., Below, J. E., Haff, M. G., Long, M. T., Ezpeleta, M., Freedman, J. E., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.124.037100 · Cited by 3
Metabolic Implications of Childhood Cancer
Tan, J. Y., Shabane, B., Orgel, E., & Mittelman, S. D. (2025) · Current Pediatrics Reports · doi:10.1007/s40124-025-00348-8 · Cited by 4
“However, both CT and MRI can be used to precisely differentiate fat distribution (e.g. visceral vs. subcutaneous), and even mea - sure fat content in specific organs of interest, making them the gold standard for studies in which precise measures are needed [29].”
Liver fat quantification using deep silicon photon-counting CT: an in silico imaging study
Panta, R. K., Yin, Z., Grönberg, F., Wildman‐Tobriner, B., Bhattarai, M., Abadi, E., Segars, W. P., & Samei, E. (2025) · Radiology Advances · doi:10.1093/radadv/umaf031 · Cited by 3
Tian, Y., Liu, P., Li, J., Li, Y., & Sun, P. (2023) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5887 · Cited by 3
Tan, A. A., Demirtaş, D., Gülşen, H. H., Karakaya, J., Işıyel, E., Özen, H., Oguz, B. S., Haliloğlu, M., & Özcan, H. N. (2023) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05832-1 · Cited by 3
“Hepatosteatosis was accepted as a liver fat fraction > 5% on MR spectroscopy [21].”
Understanding ADC variation by fat content effect using a dual-function MRI phantom
Liu, Y., Tsai, T.-S., Li, Y., Peng, J.-H., Chang, H., Peng, H., Lee, Y.-C., Lee, T.-Y., Liou, C.-H., Lin, T.-F., et al. (2024) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-023-00414-0 · Cited by 3
“Currently, fat-water phantoms and diffusion phantoms have been used to validate MRI-based methods in quantifying the FC [12, 29–33] and to measure the diffusivity of polyethylene particle suspensions or microbead impregnated gels on DWI [11, 19, 34, 35], respectively.”
MethodFat fraction quantification with MRI estimates tumor proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma
Huang, M., Zhang, F., Li, Z., Luo, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., Ma, L., Chen, G., & Hu, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1367907 · Cited by 3
Hasan, S., Brankovic, A., Awal, M. A., Rezaeieh, S. A., Keating, S. E., Abbosh, A. M., & Zamani, A. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3489626 · Cited by 3
Teng, L., Luo, L., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Dong, Z., Cao, X., Ye, J., & Zhong, B. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17010152 · Cited by 3
“In this study, moderate and severe liver steatosis was defined by CT attenuation values below 40 HU [21].”
Santangelo, D., Ratti, F., Palumbo, D., Campisi, A., Gaeta, E. D., Gusmini, S., Augello, L., Prato, F., Steidler, S., Canevari, C., et al. (2025) · CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00270-025-04092-w · Cited by 3
“LS was defined as a mean liver density lower than 45 Hounsfield units (10, 14, 15).”
Abdominal Imaging in the Coming Decades: Better, Faster, Safer, and Cheaper?
Pickhardt, P. J. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.223087 · Cited by 3
Li, Y., Ye, X., & Chen, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1589245 · Cited by 2
Torgersen, J., Newcomb, C. W., Carbonari, D. M., Smith, S. M., Brecker, K. L., Rajapakse, C. S., Jones, B. C., Cottrell, C., Grewal, R., Price, J. C., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327668 · Cited by 2
Huang, Y., Sun, C., Cheng, J., Wang, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, S., Wang, M., Li, W., Cheng, R., Fan, J., et al. (2025) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-025-06349-5 · Cited by 2
“The cutoff values of MRI-proton density fat fraction for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis grades S0, ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and S3 were < 5%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 15%, and ≥ 25%, respectively [20].”
Artificial Intelligence in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening of the Chest
Yip, R., Jirapatnakul, A. C., Avila, R., Gutiérrez, J. G., Naghavi, M., Yankelevitz, D. F., & Henschke, C. I. (2025) · Journal of Thoracic Imaging · doi:10.1097/rti.0000000000000854 · Cited by 2
Ye, J., Song, R., Gong, X., Li, X., Shao, C., & Zhong, B. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13102431 · Cited by 2
“An unenhanced CT scan (Aquilion 64, Canon Medical Systems, with parameter settings as follows: tube current: 250 mA; tube voltage: 120 Kv; layer thickness: 5 mm) showing liver measurements of lower than 48 HU was considered indicative of liver steatosis [16,17].”
Zhang, C., Niu, B., Wang, R., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1681686 · Cited by 4
Reddy, R. S., Pickhardt, P. J., Manrai, A. K., Summers, R. M., Kim, D. A., & Rajpurkar, P. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01558-7 · Cited by 2
Song, J., Ling, W., Peng, W., Song, L., Yang, Z., Feng, L., Huang, L., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.70075 · Cited by 2
Hepatic fat fraction and lipid content of adrenal adenomas: insights from unenhanced CT
Konukoğlu, O., Kaya, M., & Cindemir, E. (2025) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-025-05310-2 · Cited by 2
Highly Reproducible, Vendor‐Agnostic, Motion‐Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T , 1.5T , and 3T
Tang, J., Tamada, D., Nielsen, J., Starekova, J., Heidenreich, J. F., Schön, F., Anagnostopoulos, A. A., Roshanshad, A., Mao, L., Fujita, S., et al. (2025) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.70223 · Cited by 3
Physiological foundation modeling for subclinical disease assessment: a prospective pilot
Yuan, W., Xu, S., Dionisi, S., von Herrmann, K. M., Frederick-Dyer, K. C., Cheung‐Flynn, J., Kennedy, C. J., Flynn, C. R., & Lipnick, S. (2026) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag002 · Cited by 2
“22 Clinically-accessible data elements including demographics, medical history, comorbidities, lab results, and lifestyle factors were extracted and manually harmonized across datasets.”
Zhang, M., Yu, N., Yang, C., Duan, H., & Ren, Z. (2026) · Die Radiologie · doi:10.1007/s00117-026-01562-1 · Cited by 2
Ma, Z., Liu, B., Zhou, S., Yang, S., Sun, X., Jiang, X., & Sun, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1802284 · Cited by 2
“Nevertheless, its capacity for targeted fat assessment and spatial granularity positions it as a favorable option for both diagnosis and longitudinal disease monitoring (Kuroda et al., 2021; Starekova et al., 2021).”
Jiang, R., Rosenblatt, M., Qi, S., Calhoun, V. D., Wang, Q., Wang, P., Wu, J. I. A. H. U. I., Scheinost, D., & Jing Sui (Beijing Normal University), my correct affiliation is beijing normal university, N. Q. U. O. S. A. T. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeg4939 · Cited by 2
“PDFF is an accurate and precise approach for quantifying intrahepatic liver fat content ( 58 ).”
Lamprinakos, I., Orfanidou, M., Rafailidis, V. D., & Pοlyzos, S. A. (2026) · HORMONES · doi:10.1007/s42000-026-00802-2 · Cited by 2
Chan, S. M., Hong, C. W., Ceriani, L., Dhyani, M., Fowler, K. J., Middleton, M. S., Pierce, T. T., Pickhardt, P. J., Reeder, S. B., Samir, A. E., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.26.34836 · Cited by 2
Screening and diagnosis of liver disease in diabetes: a guide and evidence-based assessment
Qadri, S. U. (2026) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06816-0 · Cited by 2
“• CT: decreased hepatic attenuation [12].”
InfluentialEl informe radiológico en paciente con hepatopatía crónica
Baleato‐González, S., & García‐Figueiras, R. (2022) · Radiología · doi:10.1016/j.rx.2022.01.009 · Cited by 2
Cunha, G. M., Kolokythas, O., Chen, W., Akcicek, H., Hitt, D., Briller, N., & Amin, K. A. (2023) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-023-03902-4 · Cited by 2
“5 T < 60 s−1), borderline high iron content (R2* = 60–120 s−1), mild iron overload (R2* = 120–270 s−1), moderate (R2* = 270–580 s−1), severe (R2* > 580 s−1) [3, 7, 21] PDFF determined steatosis Iron overload”
BackgroundBock, T. D., Brussaard, C. C., François, S., François, K., Seynaeve, L., Jansen, A., Wissing, K. M., & Janssens, P. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13102888 · Cited by 2
“Alcohol abuse is defined as ≥ 30 g/day for men and ≥ 20 g/day for women; Uncontrolled hypertension is defined as an office blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg [17].”
BackgroundMeng, F., Pian, L., Wang, Q., Chen, J., Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2025) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2025.106854 · Cited by 2
van der Pol, C. B., Sabil, M., Komar, M. A., Ruo, L., Silva, J. M., Mbuagbaw, L. C. E., Liau, J., Nguyen, R., Chung, A. D., Hu, Z., et al. (2025) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.24.32160 · Cited by 2
Trizzino, M., Gaudiano, R., Arena, D., Pipitò, L., Gioè, C., & Cascio, A. (2025) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v17030440 · Cited by 2
“Nevertheless, its invasive nature, associated procedural risks (e.g., bleeding, infection), and potential sampling variability render it unsuitable for routine monitoring, particularly in asymptomatic or stable patients [45–47].”
Yoo, J., Joo, I., Jeon, S. K., Park, J., & Cho, E. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96053-z · Cited by 2
“Notably, both parameters have been widely used as indicators of steatosis in various studies 27 , and studies comparing them have shown similar efficacy 14,28 .”
Diallo, T. D., Karrasch, S., Jung, M., Peters, A., Lorbeer, R., Schlett, C. L., von Krüchten, R., Bamberg, F., Rospleszcz, S., & Kiefer, L. S. (2025) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-025-03297-4 · Cited by 2
“Due to these advantages, PDFF has been established as an imaging biomarker for tissue fat quantification and represents the reference standard for non-invasive fat assessment [49, 50].”
Dual-energy CT liver fat fraction as prognostic imaging biomarker in critically ill patients
Erley, J., Breckow, J., Roedl, K., Ozga, A., Duoerkongjiang, A., de Heer, G., Schubert, N., Pallasch, F. B., Burdelski, C. M., Kluge, S., et al. (2025) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-025-11851-3 · Cited by 2
“Because most clinical questions in this patient clientele require the administration of an intravenous contrast agent, the reliability of conventional CT-density-based liver fat quanti fi cation is limited [6, 7].”
Deng, D., Han, P., Chen, S., Wang, M., & Chen, C. (2025) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkaf081 · Cited by 2
“However, obtaining accurate liver PDFF, captured by MRI-based water-fat separation technique (Starekova et al., 2021), can be time-consuming, expensive, and is known to have high sampling variability (Kramer et al., 2017).”
Han, A. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.232475 · Cited by 2
US Attenuation Coefficient for Liver Fat Quantification: A Need for Standardization
Han, A. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.242511 · Cited by 2
Proton Density Fat Fraction and Its Role in Prediction of Metabolic Dysfunction
Reeder, S. B., & Starekova, J. (2025) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.253052 · Cited by 2
Takasu, M., Higashino, R., Sueoka, T., Kawai, S., Tanitame, N., Tamura, A., Iida, M., Kawase, T., Ichinohe, T., & Awai, K. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283241 · Cited by 1
“Fat fraction calculated in MRI is a noninvasive means of quantifying fat within the BM, liver, and musculoskeletal system, and is reported to be useful in the prediction of remission status after chemotherapy for MM [16], in osteoporosis [35], in differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of…”
BackgroundSpectrally selective and interleaved water imaging and fat imaging ( siWIFI )
Shin, S. H., Tang, Q., Carl, M., Athertya, J., Suprana, A. A., & Ma, Y. (2024) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.30366 · Cited by 1
“12,13 However, they are susceptible to water–fat swap errors and motion-induced artifacts, necessitating breath-holding during abdominal imaging.”
Long, S., Wang, P., & Shen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.jepm.2024.12.003 · Cited by 1
Teng, L., Luo, L., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Dong, Z., Cao, X., Ye, J., & Zhong, B. (2024) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111973 · Cited by 1
Jerath, A., Rewari, N., Gupta, P. C., Jearth, V., Singh, A. K., Shah, J., Samanta, J., Mandavdhare, H. S., Sharma, V., Sinha, S. K., et al. (2025) · Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1802969 · Cited by 1
Li, Y.-Y. (2025) · Advances in Clinical Medicine · doi:10.12677/acm.2025.153776 · Cited by 1
Wang, Y., Zhang, M., & Wang, P. (2025) · Lipids · doi:10.1002/lipd.12453 · Cited by 1
“Radiological imaging techniques are effective strategies for diagnosing and/or assessing the extent of NAFLD, mainly including ultrasound and computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transient elastography (TE), and liver biopsy (Starekova et al. 2021; Ozturk et al. 2022).”
Chen, G., Yang, B., Ma, S., Chen, D., Yin, T., Grimm, R., Wang, Q., Hu, X., Kamel, I. R., Wei, L., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000002566 · Cited by 1
Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis Grades with Thermoacoustic Imaging in a Rabbit Model
Xiang, H., Huang, L., Zheng, Z., Li, J., Qiu, T., Wu, Z., Shi, Y., Jiang, H., Ling, W., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Advanced ultrasound in diagnosis and therapy · doi:10.37015/audt.2025.240074 · Cited by 1
Gloor, D. A., Todorski, I., Peters, A. A., Wagner, B., Gassenmaier, T., Roos, J. E., Christe, A., Ebner, L., & Huber, A. T. (2025) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-025-11886-6 · Cited by 1
Han, S., Joo, I., Park, J. Y., Jeon, S. K., & Yoon, S. H. (2025) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2025.107079 · Cited by 1
Imaging Modalities for Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review Article
Damle, V. A., Sharma, A., Srivastava, B. K., & Mohan, V. (2025) · Journal of Diabetology · doi:10.4103/jod.jod_68_25 · Cited by 1
Hao, A., Li, C., Sun, R., Tan, B., Shao, G., Li, K., Li, N., Hu, W., Qu, C., & Cao, J. (2025) · Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma · doi:10.2147/jhc.s536629 · Cited by 1
“37”
Song, J., Liu, D., Li, J., Cong, H., Deng, R., Lu, Y., Sun, J., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/78310 · Cited by 3
“…they lack precision in quantifying HS. Quantitative imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) [8], controlled attenuation parameter-based transient elastography, and noninvasive analysis [9], offer superior accuracy but are constrained by cost…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Starekova, J., Hernando, D., Pickhardt, P. J., & Reeder, S. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-262
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- PMC
- PMC8574059
- OpenAlex
- W3199340922
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health contsponsor (R01 DK088925, R01 DK100651, R44-EB025729, R01-DK117354)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- hepatic steatosis, liver fat quantification, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chemical shift MRI, non-invasive imaging, cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, artificial intelligence, treatment monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Fatty Liver, Humans, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review