The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the reliability of computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features in distinguishing lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT (n= 29) and MR (n = 40) images and radiographs (n = 28) of 60 patients with histologically verified fatty tumors (35 lipomas and 25 well-differentiated liposarcomas) were retrospectively reviewed in 31 females and 29 males (mean age, 56 years; age range, 1-88 years). Images were assessed for adipose tissue content, and non-fatty component was classified (thin and/or thick septa and nodular and/or globular components) as absent, mild, moderate, or pronounced. Also assessed were signal intensity and tissue attenuation of the fatty components and non-adipose elements. RESULTS: Statistically significant imaging features favoring a diagnosis of liposarcoma included lesion larger than 10 cm (P <.001), presence of thick septa (P =.001), presence of globular and/or nodular non-adipose areas (P =.003) or masses (P =.001), and lesion less than 75% fat (P <.001). The most statistically significant radiologic predictors of malignancy were male sex, presence of thick septa, and associated non-adipose masses, which increased the likelihood of malignancy by 13-, nine-, and 32-fold, respectively. Both lipoma and liposarcoma demonstrated thin septa and regions of increased signal intensity on fluid-sensitive MR images. CONCLUSION: A significant number of lipomas will have prominent non-adipose areas and will demonstrate an imaging appearance traditionally ascribed to well-differentiated liposarcoma. Features that suggest malignancy include increased patient age, large lesion size, presence of thick septa, presence of nodular and/or globular or non-adipose mass-like areas, and decreased percentage of fat composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soft-Tissue Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions: A Systematic Imaging Approach
Wu, J. S., & Hochman, M. G. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2532081199 · Cited by 320
The cost-effectiveness of public health interventions
Owen, L., Morgan, A., Fischer, A., Ellis, S., Hoy, A., & Kelly, M. P. (2012) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr075 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Kransdorf, M. J., Bancroft, L. W., Peterson, J. J., Murphey, M. D., Foster, W. C., & Temple, H. T.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 224
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-104
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2101407531
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2241011113
- The paper
- Kransdorf, M. J., Bancroft, L. W., Peterson, J. J., Murphey, M. D., Foster, W. C., & Temple, H. T. (2002). Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241011113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.