Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 525

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma

Kransdorf, Mark J., Bancroft, Laura W., Peterson, Jeffrey J., Murphey, Mark D., Foster, William C., Temple, H. Thomas·2002·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the reliability of computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features in distinguishing lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT (n= 29) and MR (n = 40) images and radiographs (n = 28) of 60 patients with histologically verified fatty tumors (35 lipomas and 25 well-differentiated liposarcomas) were retrospectively reviewed in 31 females and 29 males (mean age, 56 years; age range, 1-88 years). Images were assessed for adipose tissue content, and non-fatty component was classified (thin and/or thick septa and nodular and/or globular components) as absent, mild, moderate, or pronounced. Also assessed were signal intensity and tissue attenuation of the fatty components and non-adipose elements. RESULTS: Statistically significant imaging features favoring a diagnosis of liposarcoma included lesion larger than 10 cm (P <.001), presence of thick septa (P =.001), presence of globular and/or nodular non-adipose areas (P =.003) or masses (P =.001), and lesion less than 75% fat (P <.001). The most statistically significant radiologic predictors of malignancy were male sex, presence of thick septa, and associated non-adipose masses, which increased the likelihood of malignancy by 13-, nine-, and 32-fold, respectively. Both lipoma and liposarcoma demonstrated thin septa and regions of increased signal intensity on fluid-sensitive MR images. CONCLUSION: A significant number of lipomas will have prominent non-adipose areas and will demonstrate an imaging appearance traditionally ascribed to well-differentiated liposarcoma. Features that suggest malignancy include increased patient age, large lesion size, presence of thick septa, presence of nodular and/or globular or non-adipose mass-like areas, and decreased percentage of fat composition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2241011113

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 525

Metadata

Authors
Kransdorf, M. J., Bancroft, L. W., Peterson, J. J., Murphey, M. D., Foster, W. C., & Temple, H. T.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2002-07
Volume
224
Issue
1
Pages
99-104
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2101407531
Cited by
525
References
0
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2241011113
The paper
Kransdorf, M. J., Bancroft, L. W., Peterson, J. J., Murphey, M. D., Foster, W. C., & Temple, H. T. (2002). Imaging of Fatty Tumors: Distinction of Lipoma and Well-differentiated Liposarcoma. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2241011113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.