Cited by 278Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMRI in cancer diagnosis

Chemical Shift MR Imaging of Hyperattenuating (>10 HU) Adrenal Masses: Does It Still Have a Role?

Haider, Masoom A., Ghai, Sangeet, Jhaveri, Kartik, Lockwood, Gina·2004·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate chemical shift magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the characterization of hyperattenuating adrenal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adrenal MR images obtained from January 1998 to February 2003 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo unenhanced computed tomography or did not have an adrenal mass with attenuation higher than 10 HU, adequate follow-up, or pathologic diagnosis for use as a reference standard. A diagnosis of adenoma required at least 24 weeks of stability on images. Thirty-eight masses in 36 patients were identified (27 adenomas, nine metastases, one adrenocortical oncocytoma, and one pheochromocytoma). Signal intensity (SI) decrease between in-phase and opposed-phase MR images was measured for the entire mass and normalized to the renal parenchymal SI. In 21 of 36 (58%) patients, dual-echo single-breath-hold MR imaging was used to eliminate misregistration. RESULTS: The attenuation of 61% (23 of 38) of all masses and 70% (19 of 27) of adenomas was 10-30 HU. With a threshold of 20% SI decrease, the sensitivity of chemical shift MR imaging for hyperattenuating adenoma was 67% (18 of 27 masses). When considering masses with attenuation of 10-30 HU, the sensitivity for adenoma was 89% (17 of 19 masses) and remained reasonable at 75% (six of eight masses) for adenomas with attenuation of 20-30 HU. Only one adenoma with attenuation higher than 30 HU had SI decrease of more than 20%. Specificity for diagnosis of adenoma was 100% (11 of 11). CONCLUSION: In certain circumstances, chemical shift MR imaging is a reasonable second imaging test for further characterization of a hyperattenuating adrenal mass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2313030676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACCs can be distinguished from lipid-rich ACAs, which tend to be small, homogeneous masses measuring ≤10 HU on unenhanced CT or showing loss of signal on chemical-shift MRI.

    “ACCs can be distinguished from lipid-rich ACAs, which tend to be small, homogeneous masses that measure ≤10 HU on unenhanced CT or demonstrate loss of signal on chemical-shift MRI (102).”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [102]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 278

Authors
Haider, M. A., Ghai, S., Jhaveri, K., & Lockwood, G.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2004-06
Volume
231
Issue
3
Pages
711-716
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2098892823
Cited by
278
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
adrenal adenoma, adrenal metastasis, adrenocortical oncocytoma, pheochromocytoma, sensitivity and specificity, adrenal mass characterization
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Adenoma, Oxyphilic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review