CT Images of Abdomen and Pelvis: Effect of Nonlinear Three-dimensional Optimized Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Lesion Characteristics
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the effect of a postprocessing nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm on image quality and lesion characteristics in abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic (CT) images. Institutional review board approved the HIPAA-compliant study protocol; informed consent was waived. Abdominal and pelvic CT images (40 patients; male-female ratio, 20:20; age range, 28-86 years) at 5-mm (n = 20) and 2-mm (n = 20) section thicknesses were postprocessed with the algorithm at three noise reduction levels. Image noise at the level of porta hepatis and acetabulum was evaluated with a five-point scale (1, no or minimal noise; 5, unacceptable noise), and presence and number of lesions and conspicuity were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed (Wilcoxon signed rank test, analysis of variance). Significant noise reduction was noted at all three levels with the algorithm (P < .05). Reduction in image contrast was noted with only one noise reduction level (P < .0001). The algorithm improves image noise without affecting lesion conspicuity and detection on low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT images.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-powered imaging analysis and radiomics have improved detection and classification of pulmonary nodules, prediction of lymph node metastasis, and integration of molecular and radiomic features for non-invasive stratification.
“AI-powered imaging analysis and radiomics have improved detection and classification of pulmonary nodules, prediction of lymph node metastasis, and integration of molecular and radiomic features for non-invasive stratification [4,5,6].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: Clinical Decision Support and Emerging Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petrella, F., & Rizzo, S. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18020246 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rizzo, S. M. R., Kalra, M. K., Schmidt, B., Raupach, R., Maher, M. M., Blake, M. A., & Saini, S.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 237
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 309-315
- ISSN
- 0033-8419
- 1527-1315
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review