Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CT of Small-Bowel Ischemia Associated with Obstruction in Emergency Department Patients: Diagnostic Performance Evaluation

Sheedy, Shannon P., Earnest, Frank, Fletcher, Joel G., Fidler, Jeff L., Hoskin, Tanya L.·2006·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) for detection of small-bowel ischemia in emergency department patients with abdominal pain and to compare the prospective interpretation with a retrospective interpretation by using surgical or pathologic findings as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and patients consented to research authorization. Sixty patients (61 examinations) (25 male, 35 female patients; median age, 67 years; range, 0.9-89.7 years) with acute abdominal pain underwent immediate abdominal and pelvic CT and subsequent surgery of the small bowel within 7 days of CT. Prospective radiologic reports were reviewed for diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction and ischemia. Two gastrointestinal radiologists performed blinded, independent, retrospective review of the CT studies with no clinical data other than presence of acute abdominal pain. The reviewers categorized CT signs of obstruction and ischemia and estimated diagnostic certainty. Discordant findings were resolved by consensus review by a third gastrointestinal radiologist. CT interpretations were compared with prospective interpretations and surgical or pathologic findings. Sensitivity and specificity estimates with confidence intervals were calculated. Fisher exact and chi2 tests were used to assess associations between CT signs and the diagnosis of ischemia; kappa statistics were used to estimate agreement between readers. RESULTS: In 27 (44%) of 61 CT studies, small-bowel ischemia was surgically or pathologically confirmed. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ischemia were, respectively, 14.8% and 94.1% for prospective interpretations, 29.6% and 91.2% for reader 1, 40.7% and 85.3% for reader 2, and 51.9% and 88.2% for the consensus review. Decreased segmental enhancement was the most specific sign for small-bowel ischemia (P = .001), and its recognition would have improved the diagnostic performance of all readers. There was a significant association of the small-bowel feces sign with the presence of small-bowel ischemia (P = .046). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance assessment of CT for the diagnosis of small-bowel ischemia revealed poor prospective interpretation sensitivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2413050965

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Sheedy, S. P., Earnest, F., Fletcher, J. G., Fidler, J. L., & Hoskin, T. L.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2006-12
Volume
241
Issue
3
Pages
729-736
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2140210938
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT of Small-Bowel Ischemia Associated with Obstruction in Emergency Department Patients: Diagnostic Performance Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2413050965
The paper
Sheedy, S. P., Earnest, F., Fletcher, J. G., Fidler, J. L., & Hoskin, T. L. (2006). CT of Small-Bowel Ischemia Associated with Obstruction in Emergency Department Patients: Diagnostic Performance Evaluation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2413050965

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.