The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively assess quantitatively the inherent contrast of electromagnetic (EM) properties that can be imaged by using available technology in women with abnormal findings at conventional breast imaging who underwent subsequent biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board. All participants provided informed consent. Fifty-three women with normal (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 1) and ninety-seven women with abnormal (BI-RADS category 4 or 5) screening mammograms were imaged with three EM imaging methods: electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), microwave imaging spectroscopy (MIS), and near-infrared spectral tomography (NIR). A region-of-interest (ROI) analysis was used to assess the EM image properties for comparison of findings with conventional image findings and correlation with specific pathologic parameters for women with abnormal findings. Statistical analyses were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred fifty participants (age range, 35-81 years) were included. EM image property contrast ratios of 150%-200% were found in breast abnormality ROIs relative to the ipsilateral breast background. Analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in ROI image summaries of mammographically normal versus abnormal breasts for EIS, across diagnostic groups for NIR, and for MIS (analysis restricted to lesions larger than 1 cm(3)). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of the EM properties for cancers among subjects with BI-RADS category 4 or 5, compared with the EM properties for the subjects with normal breasts (BI-RADS category 1), yielded areas under the ROC curve ranging from 0.67 to 0.81. Pathologic correlations with mean vessel density, mean vessel area, and epithelium-to-stroma ratio suggest a biological origin of the EM image properties associated with disease. CONCLUSION: Results from EM breast examinations provide statistical evidence of a mean increase in image contrast of 150%-200% between abnormal (benign and malignant) and normal breast tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Kriege, M., Brekelmans, C. T. M., Boetes, C., Besnard, P. E., Zonderland, H. M., Obdeijn, I. M., Manoliu, R. A., Kok, T., Peterse, H., Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M. A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031759 · Cited by 1,687
Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials
Nyström, L., Andersson, I., Bjurstam, N., Frisell, J., Nordenskjöld, B., & Rutqvist, L. E. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08020-0 · Cited by 1,183
Carney, P. A., Miglioretti, D. L., Yankaskas, B. C., Kerlikowske, K., Rosenberg, R., Rutter, C. M., Geller, B. M., Abraham, L. A., Taplin, S. H., Dignan, M., et al. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008 · Cited by 1,142
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Humphrey, L. L., Helfand, M., Chan, B. K. S., & Woolf, S. H. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00012 · Cited by 1,137
Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations
Elmore, J. G., Barton, M. B., Moceri, V. M., Polk, S., Arena, P. J., & Fletcher, S. W. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199804163381601 · Cited by 1,053
Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.
Boyd, N. F., Lockwood, G. A., Byng, J. W., Tritchler, D., & Yaffe, M. J. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 810
The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz
Joines, W. T., Zhang, Y., Li, C., & Jirtle, R. L. (1994) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597312 · Cited by 763
Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues
Surowiec, A. J., Stuchly, S. S., Barr, J. R., & Swarup, A. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.1374 · Cited by 736
Cited by
Targeted Photothermal Lysis of the Pathogenic Bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with Gold Nanorods
Norman, R. S., Stone, J. W., Gole, A., Murphy, C. J., & Sabo-Attwood, T. L. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0727056 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Poplack, S. P., Tosteson, T. D., Wells, W. A., Pogue, B. W., Meaney, P. M., Hartov, A., Kogel, C. A., Soho, S. K., Gibson, J. J., & Paulsen, K. D.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 350-359
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2124702218
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2432060286
- The paper
- Poplack, S. P., Tosteson, T. D., Wells, W. A., Pogue, B. W., Meaney, P. M., Hartov, A., Kogel, C. A., Soho, S. K., Gibson, J. J., & Paulsen, K. D. (2007). Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2432060286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.