Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT

Zhang, Jingbo, Lefkowitz, Robert A., Ishill, Nicole M., Wang, Liang, Moskowitz, Chaya S., Russo, Paul, Eisenberg, Halley, Hricak, Hedvig·2007·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if solid renal cortical tumors can be differentiated on computed tomographic (CT) images on the basis of their morphologic features and enhancement patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained and the informed consent requirement was waived for this HIPAA-compliant study. Between January 2004 and September 2005, 193 consecutive patients (age range, 19-95 years; 112 men, 81 women) with renal masses underwent total or partial nephrectomy and preoperative renal CT. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed CT studies in an independent and blinded fashion. The pattern and degree of enhancement, lesion contour, presence of neovascularity, and calcifications were evaluated. Fisher exact tests, Pearson chi(2) tests, multivariate logistic regression, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Of the 198 renal tumors (median size, 3.4 cm; range, 1.1-20.0 cm) included in this study, 108 (55%) were clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs); 30 (15%), papillary lesions; 24 (12%), chromophobe adenomas; 14 (7%), oncocytomas; six (3%), lipid-poor angiomyolipomas; and 16 (8%), other or unclassified renal tumors. Clear cell RCC most commonly manifested with a mixed enhancement pattern of both hypervascular soft-tissue components and low-attenuation areas that corresponded to necrotic or cystic changes (reader 1, 88% of clear cell tumors; reader 2, 79% of clear cell tumors). This pattern was highly predictive of clear cell RCC (odds ratio of 22 and 54 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, for comparison with homogeneous pattern), whereas the homogeneous and peripheral enhancing patterns were more predictive of less aggressive papillary and chromophobe lesions. Clear cell RCCs and oncocytomas tended to be hypervascular, chromophobe lesions and angiomyolipomas tended to enhance moderately, and papillary lesions were mostly hypovascular. CONCLUSION: Certain imaging features and the degree of enhancement may be helpful in differentiating subtypes of renal cortical tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2442060927

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J., Lefkowitz, R. A., Ishill, N. M., Wang, L., Moskowitz, C. S., Russo, P., Eisenberg, H., & Hricak, H.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2007-08
Volume
244
Issue
2
Pages
494-504
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2106287201
Cited by
310
References
18
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2442060927
The paper
Zhang, J., Lefkowitz, R. A., Ishill, N. M., Wang, L., Moskowitz, C. S., Russo, P., Eisenberg, H., & Hricak, H. (2007). Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2442060927

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.