The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Abstract
Medical uses of radiation have grown very rapidly over the past decade, and, as of 2007, medical uses represent the largest source of exposure to the U.S. population. Most physicians have difficulty assessing the magnitude of exposure or potential risk. Effective dose provides an approximate indicator of potential detriment from ionizing radiation and should be used as one parameter in evaluating the appropriateness of examinations involving ionizing radiation. The purpose of this review is to provide a compilation of effective doses for radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures. Standard radiographic examinations have average effective doses that vary by over a factor of 1000 (0.01-10 mSv). Computed tomographic examinations tend to be in a more narrow range but have relatively high average effective doses (approximately 2-20 mSv), and average effective doses for interventional procedures usually range from 5-70 mSv. Average effective dose for most nuclear medicine procedures varies between 0.3 and 20 mSv. These doses can be compared with the average annual effective dose from background radiation of about 3 mSv.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222
Cited by
Sodickson, A., Baeyens, P. F., Andriole, K. P., Prevedello, L. M., Nawfel, R. D., Hanson, R., & Khorasani, R. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081296 · Cited by 990
Mettler, F. A., Bhargavan, M., Faulkner, K., Gilley, D. B., Gray, J. E., Ibbott, G. S., Lipoti, J. A., Mahesh, M., McCrohan, J. L., Stabin, M. G., et al. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2532082010 · Cited by 853
Self-citationNam, J. G., Park, S., Hwang, E. J., Lee, J. H., Jin, K.-N., Lim, K. Y., Vu, T. H., Sohn, J. H., Hwang, S., Goo, J. M., et al. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180237 · Cited by 539
Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Ferrero, S., Mangili, G., Bergamini, A., Inversetti, A., Giorgione, V., Viganò, P., & Candiani, M. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv045 · Cited by 321
Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from basics to new tools
Messina, C., Albano, D., Gitto, S., Tofanelli, L., Bazzocchi, A., Ulivieri, F. M., Guglielmi, G., & Sconfienza, L. M. (2020) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims.2020.03.02 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Mettler, F. A., Huda, W., Yoshizumi, T. T., & Mahesh, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 254-263
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2118604851
- Cited by
- 2,008
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2481071451
- The paper
- Mettler, F. A., Huda, W., Yoshizumi, T. T., & Mahesh, M. (2008). Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2481071451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.