The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Potential Imaging Biomarker for Prediction and Early Detection of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to help predict response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal and gastric hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained; all patients provided informed consent. Standard magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging were performed before and 3, 7, and 42 days after initiating chemotherapy for 87 hepatic metastases in 23 colorectal and gastric cancer patients (16 men, seven women; mean age, 55.7 years; range, 33-71 years). Lesions were classified as either responding or nonresponding, according to changes in size at the end of therapy. Linear mixed-effects modeling was applied to analyze change in ADCs and size following treatment. The Pearson correlation test was calculated between those ADC parameters and tumor response. RESULTS: Thirty-eight responding and 49 nonresponding metastatic lesions were evaluated. Pretherapy mean ADCs in responding lesions were significantly lower than those of nonresponding lesions (P = .003). An early increase in ADCs (on day 3 or 7) was observed in responding lesions but not in nonresponding lesions (P = .002). Weak but significant correlations were found between final tumor size reduction and both pretreatment ADCs (P = .006) and early ADC changes (day 3, P = .004; day 7, P < .001). CONCLUSION: ADC seems to be a promising tool for helping predict and monitor the early response to chemotherapy of hepatic metastases from colorectal and gastric carcinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wagner, A. D., Grothe, W., Haerting, J., Kleber, G., Grothey, A., & Fleig, W. E. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.0245 · Cited by 1,171
Cited by
Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: Past, present, and future
Iima, M., & Le Bihan, D. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150244 · Cited by 498
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Water Tells Us about Biological Tissues
Le Bihan, D., & Iima, M. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002203 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, Y., Zhang, X.-P., Sun, Y.-S., Tang, L., & Shen, L.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 894-900
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2111952125
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Potential Imaging Biomarker for Prediction and Early Detection of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2483071407
- The paper
- Cui, Y., Zhang, X.-P., Sun, Y.-S., Tang, L., & Shen, L. (2008). Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Potential Imaging Biomarker for Prediction and Early Detection of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2483071407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.