The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of the Incidental Renal Mass
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses, the increased detection of incidental renal masses with cross-sectional imaging poses problems to the radiologist and referring physician. Most incidental renal masses can be diagnosed with confidence and either ignored or treated without further testing. However, some renal masses, particularly small ones, remain indeterminate and require a management strategy that is both medically appropriate and practical. In this article, the literature will be reviewed and an approach to the diagnosis and management of the incidental renal mass will be suggested. Management recommendations, derived from data regarding the probability of malignancy in cystic and solid renal masses, are provided for two types of patients, those in the general population and those with limited life expectancy or co-morbidity. The Bosniak classification is used to guide the management of cystic masses, with observation reserved for selected patients, and the presumption of benignity recommended for simple-appearing cystic masses smaller than 1 cm. Among solid renal masses, a more aggressive overall approach is taken. However, additional imaging, and in selected patients, percutaneous biopsy, is recommended to diagnose benign neoplasms. Although additional studies are needed to establish risks and benefits, observation of solid masses may be considered in selected patients. Minimally invasive treatments of renal cancer (including percutaneous ablation) show promise but at the same time challenge the radiologist to review the approach to the incidental renal mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Managing Incidental Findings on Abdominal CT: White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee
Berland, L. L., Silverman, S. G., Gore, R. M., Mayo-Smith, W. W., Megibow, A. J., Yee, J., Brink, J. A., Baker, M. E., Federle, M. P., Foley, W. D., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013 · Cited by 868
Self-citationGill, I. S., Aron, M., Gervais, D. A., & Jewett, M. A. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp0910041 · Cited by 406
Jinzaki, M., Silverman, S. G., Akita, H., Nagashima, Y., Mikami, S., & Oya, M. (2014) · Abdominal Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0083-3 · Cited by 332
Self-citationCoy, H., Hsieh, K., Wu, W., Nagarajan, M. B., Young, J. R., Douek, M. L., Brown, M. S., Scalzo, F., & Raman, S. S. (2019) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-019-01929-0 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverman, S. G., Israel, G. M., Herts, B. R., & Richie, J. P.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 249
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-31
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2158988274
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of the Incidental Renal Mass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2491070783
- The paper
- Silverman, S. G., Israel, G. M., Herts, B. R., & Richie, J. P. (2008). Management of the Incidental Renal Mass. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2491070783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.