The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT.
Abstract
The authors assessed the accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis and staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and analyzed the survival rates of patients with resectable and unresectable tumors. A correct diagnosis based on CT findings was made in 159 of 174 patients (91%) with 13 false-positive (8%) and two false-negative diagnoses (1%). The 13 false-positive diagnoses highlight the need for confirmation of diagnosis with biopsy. The accuracy of staging with CT was compared with that of angiography (42 patients) and surgery (51 patients). CT was more accurate than angiography in demonstrating tumor involvement of major peripancreatic vessels. Staging criteria were reliable: No unresectable tumors based on CT findings were found to be resectable during surgery (42 patients), while only three of nine resectable tumors based on CT findings were found to be unresectable. Thus, no tumors were incorrectly staged, which would potentially deny surgery for a patient. The average survival rate after resection was 14 months, while the survival rates after palliative (biliary or gastrointestinal bypass) or no treatment were 8 months and 5 months, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bar-Shalom, R., Valdivia, A. Y., & Blaufox, M. D. (2000) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/snuc.2000.7439 · Cited by 340
McNulty, N. J., Francis, I. R., Platt, J. F., Cohan, R. H., Korobkin, M., & Gebremariam, A. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl1897 · Cited by 294
Ishigami, K., Yoshimitsu, K., Irie, H., Tajima, T., Asayama, Y., Nishie, A., Hirakawa, M., Ushijima, Y., Okamoto, D., Nagata, S., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.09.012 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeny, P. C., Marks, W. M., Ryan, J. A., & Traverso, L. W.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-133
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2167630377
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.166.1.2827228
- The paper
- Freeny, P. C., Marks, W. M., Ryan, J. A., & Traverso, L. W. (1988). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.166.1.2827228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.