The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether sonography could help accurately distinguish benign solid breast nodules from indeterminate or malignant nodules and whether this distinction could be definite enough to obviate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred fifty sonographically solid breast nodules were prospectively classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant. Benign nodules had no malignant characteristics and had either intense homogeneous hyperechogenicity or a thin echogenic pseudocapsule with an ellipsoid shape or fewer than four gentle lobulations. Sonographic classifications were compared with biopsy results. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the classifications were calculated. RESULTS: Benign histologic features were found in 625 (83%) lesions; malignant histologic features, in 125 (17%). Of benign lesions, 424 had been prospectively classified as benign. Two lesions classified as benign were found to be malignant at biopsy. Thus, the classification scheme had a negative predictive value of 99.5%. Of 125 malignant lesions, 123 were correctly classified as indeterminate or malignant (98.4% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: Sonography can be used to accurately classify some solid lesions as benign, allowing imaging follow-up rather than biopsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092 · Cited by 1,157
Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks
Yap, M. H., Pons, G., Martí, J., Ganau, S., Sentís, M., Zwiggelaar, R., Davison, A. K., & Martí, R. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2731873 · Cited by 1,086
Horvath, E., Majlis, S., Rossi, R., Franco, C., Niedmann, J. P., Castro, A., & Dominguez, M. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1724 · Cited by 1,020
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Costanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H. J., & Sener, S. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141 · Cited by 770
Anderson, B. O., Yip, C.-H., Smith, R. A., Shyyan, R., Sener, S. F., Eniu, A., Carlson, R. W., Azavedo, E., & Harford, J. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23844 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Stavros, A. T., Thickman, D., Rapp, C. L., Dennis, M. A., Parker, S. H., & Sisney, G. A.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-134
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2028672930
- Cited by
- 1,780
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784555
- The paper
- Stavros, A. T., Thickman, D., Rapp, C. L., Dennis, M. A., Parker, S. H., & Sisney, G. A. (1995). Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.