The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of dual-phase helical computed tomography (CT) (with or without CT angiography) to assess resectability in patients suspected to have pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor resectability was prospectively evaluated in 89 patients who later underwent surgery for suspected pancreatic cancer. Helical CT scans were obtained in the vascular phase and a phase of maximal hepatic enhancement. CT angiograms were produced with multiprojection volume reconstruction and maximum-intensity projection. CT results were correlated with surgical and histopathologic results. RESULTS: Helical CT allowed detection of pancreatic cancer in 74 of 76 cases (97%). There were six false-positive results (positive predictive value, 92%). For prediction of irresectability, helical CT had an accuracy of 91%, negative predictive value of 79%, and sensitivity of 91%. Helical CT allowed detection of liver metastases in 21 of 28 cases (75%), nodal involvement in 13 of 24 cases (54%), and vascular invasion in 35 of 40 cases (88%). CT angiography demonstrated 30 of the 35 cases of vascular invasion detected with helical CT (86%). CONCLUSION: Use of dual-phase helical CT improves prediction of resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer. CT angiography cannot show all of the findings seen on helical scans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamisawa, T., Wood, L. D., Itoi, T., & Takaori, K. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00141-0 · Cited by 2,212
Isoattenuating Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Multi–Detector Row CT: Secondary Signs
Prokesch, R. W., Chow, L. C., Beaulieu, C. F., Bammer, R., & Jeffrey, R. B. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2243011284 · Cited by 337
McNulty, N. J., Francis, I. R., Platt, J. F., Cohan, R. H., Korobkin, M., & Gebremariam, A. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl1897 · Cited by 294
Bipat, S., Phoa, S. S. K. S., van Delden, O. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Gouma, D. J., Lam??ris, J. S., & Stoker, J. (2005) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/01.rct.0000164513.23407.b3 · Cited by 272
Ishigami, K., Yoshimitsu, K., Irie, H., Tajima, T., Asayama, Y., Nishie, A., Hirakawa, M., Ushijima, Y., Okamoto, D., Nagata, S., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.09.012 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Diehl, S. J., Lehmann, K. J., Sadick, M., Lachmann, R., & Georgi, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 373-378
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2045322781
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457188
- The paper
- Diehl, S. J., Lehmann, K. J., Sadick, M., Lachmann, R., & Georgi, M. (1998). Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.