The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the clinical applications and diagnostic accuracy of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in a large patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breath-hold, heavily T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE MRCP was performed in 265 patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease and in 35 control patients without symptoms or signs referrable to the biliary tract or pancreatic duct. MRCP findings were correlated with those at direct cholangiography, pathologic examination, cross-sectional imaging, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Diagnostic MRCP examinations were obtained in 299 (99.7%) subjects. MRCP yielded an accuracy of 100% in determining the presence of pancreaticobiliary disease, the presence and level of biliary obstruction, and obstruction due to bile duct calculi. The accuracy of MRCP and MR imaging in determining the presence and level of malignant obstruction was 98.2%. MRCP obviated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by excluding choledocholithiasis in patients with acute pancreatitis (n = 13) and nonspecific abdominal pain (n = 82). In patients with sclerosing cholangitis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome cholangiopathy, MRCP depicted the biliary tract as clearly as did ERCP (n = 9). After failed ERCP, MRCP delineated the pancreaticobiliary tract and helped determine therapeutic options (n = 27). CONCLUSION: Half-Fourier RARE MRCP enables accurate evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease and obviates ERCP in some patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos)
Kiriyama, S., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Solomkin, J. S., Mayumi, T., Pitt, H. A., Gouma, D. J., Garden, O. J., Büchler, M. W., Yokoe, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00534-012-0561-3 · Cited by 288
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography-a case-control study
Fulcher, A. S., Turner, M. A., Franklin, K. J., Shiffman, M. L., Sterling, R. K., Luketic, V. A. C., & Sanyal, A. J. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap2671 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fulcher, A. S., Turner, M. A., Capps, G. W., Zfass, A. M., & Baker, K. M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-32
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2145787100
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530295
- The paper
- Fulcher, A. S., Turner, M. A., Capps, G. W., Zfass, A. M., & Baker, K. M. (1998). Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.