Cited by 49Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Cognitive stimulation with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: functional MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can demonstrate a specific pattern of cerebral activation during cognitive stimulation by using a high-level cognitive task such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Materials and methods Thirty-one healthy volunteers underwent functional MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR imager with a standard head coil (100/50 [repetition time msec/echo time msec], 230-mm field of view, 40 degrees flip angle, 256 x 256 matrix). For stimulation, a personal computer version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was used. Image analysis was done off-line, and cross-correlation coefficients between the stimulus function and the signal intensity response were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and overlaid onto the corresponding anatomic MR image for each volunteer. Results Stimulation resulted in strongly frontal activation, which included the mesial and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortexes, interconnected with Brodmann areas 44, 45, and 46. While activation was often bilateral, the largest area of activation was in the right hemisphere. Activation also was found in the basal ganglia and the mesial thalamic nuclei. Conclusion Functional MR imaging can demonstrate a specific pattern during activation with a cognitive task. Functional MR imaging has promise for more precise anatomic and functional imaging studies of brain interaction than have other imaging modalities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577487

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 49

Metadata

Authors
Mentzel, H. J., Gaser, C., Volz, H. P., Rzanny, R., Häger, F., Sauer, H., & Kaiser, W. A.
Affiliations
Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
Radiology
Published
1998-05
Volume
207
Issue
2
Pages
399-404
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2052075023
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, cognitive stimulation, brain activation, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamic nuclei, right hemisphere dominance
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Microcomputers, Psychomotor Performance, Thalamic Nuclei, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review