The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Cognitive stimulation with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: functional MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can demonstrate a specific pattern of cerebral activation during cognitive stimulation by using a high-level cognitive task such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Materials and methods Thirty-one healthy volunteers underwent functional MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR imager with a standard head coil (100/50 [repetition time msec/echo time msec], 230-mm field of view, 40 degrees flip angle, 256 x 256 matrix). For stimulation, a personal computer version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was used. Image analysis was done off-line, and cross-correlation coefficients between the stimulus function and the signal intensity response were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and overlaid onto the corresponding anatomic MR image for each volunteer. Results Stimulation resulted in strongly frontal activation, which included the mesial and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortexes, interconnected with Brodmann areas 44, 45, and 46. While activation was often bilateral, the largest area of activation was in the right hemisphere. Activation also was found in the basal ganglia and the mesial thalamic nuclei. Conclusion Functional MR imaging can demonstrate a specific pattern during activation with a cognitive task. Functional MR imaging has promise for more precise anatomic and functional imaging studies of brain interaction than have other imaging modalities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functional imaging studies show that a network of frontal and nonfrontal brain regions is involved in Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance.
“These results are congruent with those from recent functional imaging studies that show a network of frontal and nonfrontal brain regions to be involved in WCST performance (e.g., Marenco et al., 1993; Mentzel et al., 1998)”
From The case for the development and use of ecologically valid measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology (2006) · cites this paper as Mentzel et al., 1998
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Mentzel, H. J., Gaser, C., Volz, H. P., Rzanny, R., Häger, F., Sauer, H., & Kaiser, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2052075023
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, cognitive stimulation, brain activation, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamic nuclei, right hemisphere dominance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Microcomputers, Psychomotor Performance, Thalamic Nuclei, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review