Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Susceptibility Sign at Susceptibility-based Perfusion MR Imaging: Clinical Importance and Comparison with Hyperdense MCA Sign at CT1

Flacke, Sebastian, Urbach, Horst, Keller, Ewald, Träber, Frank, Hartmann, Alexander, Textor, Jochen, Gieseke, Juergen, Block, Wolfgang, Folkers, Paul J. M., Schild, Hans H.·2000·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the radiologic findings of susceptibility changes in acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) thromboembolism detected with three-dimensional (3D) susceptibility-based perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to compare the detectability and clinical value of this sign with those of the hyperdense MCA sign at computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (mean age, 55 years) underwent CT and MR imaging within the first 6 hours after the onset of acute MCA stroke. The hyperdense MCA sign at CT and the presence of susceptibility changes in acute thromboembolism as depicted on T2*-weighted 3D perfusion MR images were assessed. The presence of each sign was correlated with clinical presentation. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the hyperdense MCA sign at CT was 54% (negative predictive value, 71%) compared with 82% (negative predictive value, 86%) for the susceptibility changes at MR imaging. There were no false-positive CT or MR readings. The presence of the MCA susceptibility sign correlated positively with the initial clinical presentation (chi(2) = 7.987, P =.009, Spearman rho = 0.589). However, neither of the signs was a predictor for clinical outcome in cases of spontaneous MCA stroke. CONCLUSION: In addition to the information traditionally provided with reconstructed perfusion parameter maps, 3D susceptibility-based perfusion MR images allow the identification of acute MCA thromboembolism with a sensitivity higher than that of CT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma09476

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Flacke, S., Urbach, H., Keller, E., Träber, F., Hartmann, A., Textor, J., Gieseke, J., Block, W., Folkers, P. J. M., & Schild, H. H.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2000-05
Volume
215
Issue
2
Pages
476-482
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2168721819
Cited by
175
References
1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Susceptibility Sign at Susceptibility-based Perfusion MR Imaging: Clinical Importance and Comparison with Hyperdense MCA Sign at CT1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma09476
The paper
Flacke, S., Urbach, H., Keller, E., Träber, F., Hartmann, A., Textor, J., Gieseke, J., Block, W., Folkers, P. J. M., & Schild, H. H. (2000). Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Susceptibility Sign at Susceptibility-based Perfusion MR Imaging: Clinical Importance and Comparison with Hyperdense MCA Sign at CT1. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma09476

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.