The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imaging of Tinnitus: A Review
Abstract
Tinnitus, a buzzing or ringing in the ear, may be pulsatile or continuous (nonpulsatile). The distinction, with a detailed clinical evaluation, determines the most appropriate imaging study. Pulsatile tinnitus suggests a vascular neoplasm, vascular anomaly, or vascular malformation. Most of the neoplasms are glomus tympanicum and glomus jugulare tumors. Vascular anomalies may cause pulsatile tinnitus, but the mechanism is unknown, and another (treatable) cause should be sought. Most neoplasms and anomalies are best seen on bone algorithm computed tomographic (CT) studies. Dural vascular malformations are often elusive on all cross-sectional imaging studies; conventional angiography may be necessary to make this diagnosis. Flow-sensitive magnetic resonance (MR) images show vascular loops compressing the eighth cranial nerve. Carotid dissections, aneurysms, atherosclerosis, and fibromuscular dysplasia can be identified on both MR imaging or MR angiographic studies and CT or CT angiographic studies. Otosclerosis and Paget disease are CT diagnoses. Benign intracranial hypertension often has no abnormal imaging findings. For patients with nonpulsatile tinnitus, MR imaging is the study of choice to exclude a vestibular schwannoma or other neoplasm of the cerebellopontine angle cistern. Multiple sclerosis and a Chiari I malformation are rare causes of pulsatile tinnitus, also best seen on MR studies. Many patients with tinnitus have no abnormal imaging findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus
Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R., Theodoulou, M., & Waddell, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005233.pub3 · Cited by 477
Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: Results from PET and fMRI
Lanting, C. P., de Kleine, E., & van Dijk, P. (2009) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.009 · Cited by 318
Underlying Mechanisms of Tinnitus: Review and Clinical Implications
Henry, J. A., Roberts, L. E., Caspary, D. M., Theodoroff, S. M., & Salvi, R. J. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.1.2 · Cited by 268
A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment
Pienkowski, M., Tyler, R. S., Roncancio, E. R., Jun, H. J., Brozoski, T., Dauman, N., Coelho, C. B., Andersson, G., Keiner, A. J., Cacace, A. T., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2014_aja-13-0037 · Cited by 138
Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults
Hobson, J., Chisholm, E., & El Refaie, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006371.pub2 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Weissman, J. L., & Hirsch, B. E.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 342-349
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2076827995
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of Tinnitus: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au45342
- The paper
- Weissman, J. L., & Hirsch, B. E. (2000). Imaging of Tinnitus: A Review. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au45342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.