Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) scans and attenuation measurements on contrast material-enhanced and nonenhanced CT scans could be used to characterize adrenal masses, in particular, to characterize these lesions by using adrenal washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients (49 men, 37 women; age range, 29-86 years; mean age, 72 years) with 101 adrenal lesions depicted at contrast-enhanced CT underwent delayed (mean, 9 minutes) enhanced scanning. Seventy-eight patients also underwent nonenhanced CT. Mean diameter of the benign lesions was 2.1 cm (range, 1.0-4.2 cm); mean diameter of the malignant lesions was 2.3 cm (range, 1.0-4.1 cm). Region-of-interest measurements were obtained at nonenhanced, dynamic enhanced, and delayed enhanced CT and were used to calculate a relative percentage washout as follows: 1 - (Hounsfield unit measurement on delayed image / Hounsfield unit measurement on dynamic image) x 100%. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 101 lesions were correctly characterized as benign or malignant with a relative percentage washout threshold of 50% on delayed scans; benign lesions demonstrated more than 50% washout; and malignant lesions, less than 50% washout. Two benign lesions demonstrating less than 50% washout were characterized as benign by using conventional CT. CONCLUSION: Calculation of relative percentage washout on dynamic and delayed enhanced CT scans may lead to a highly specific test for adrenal lesion characterization, reduce the need for, and possibly obviate, follow-up imaging or biopsy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Absolute washout >60% suggests benign adenoma.
“Absolute washout values of >60% (early enhanced HU – delayed HU)/(early enhanced HU – unenhanced HU) × 100% suggest a benign adenoma (295,299).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [295]
Approximately 30% of benign adrenal adenomas are lipid-poor (attenuation >10 HU) and cannot be reliably characterized on unenhanced CT due to overlapping density with malignant lesions and pheochromocytomas.
“Approximately 30% of benign adrenal adenomas do not contain large amounts of fat and have an attenuation value of >10 HU (ie, lipid-poor adenomas), these lesions cannot be reliably characterized on unenhanced CT due to an overlapping density with malignant lesions and pheochromocytomas (295,296).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [295]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 399
- Authors
- Peña, C. S., Boland, G. W. L., Hahn, P. F., Lee, M. J., & Mueller, P. R.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 798-802
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2104376522
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Keywords
- adrenal mass, contrast-enhanced CT, late gadolinium enhancement, Hounsfield units
- MeSH terms
- Adenoma, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Myelolipoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review