The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Preoperative Detection and Assessment of Resectability with Helical CT
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate helical computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative detection of hepatic metastases and assessment of resectability with surgical, intraoperative ultrasonographic (US), and histopathologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1995 and December 1998, preoperative staging with helical CT (5-mm collimation; reconstruction interval, 5 mm) was performed in 157 patients with hepatic metastases. Iodinated contrast material was injected intravenously (160-170 mL; rate, 2.5-3.0 mL/sec); acquisition began at 60-70 seconds. Four radiologists prospectively assessed the metastatic involvement of the liver by indicating the number and location of the lesions; resection was indicated in 113 patients (119 instances). Helical CT findings were correlated with pathologic and surgical findings on a lesion-by-lesion basis. RESULTS: Intraoperative US, palpation, and histopathologic examination revealed 290 liver metastases; helical CT correctly depicted 247. Helical CT results were the following: overall detection rate, 85.1% (95% CI: 80.8%, 89.3%); positive predictive value, 96.1% (95% CI: 92.9%, 98.1%); and false-positive rate, 3.9% (10 of 257 findings; 95% CI: 1.9%, 7.1%). False-positive findings were related to hemangioendothelioma, hemangioma, hepatic peliosis, biliary adenoma, centrilobar hemorrhage, biliary hamartoma, periportal fibrosis, and normal liver parenchyma. Curative resection was performed in 112 instances with a resectability rate of 94.1%. Four-year patient survival rate was 58.6%. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is a noninvasive, reliable, and accurate technique for imaging the liver and should be considered as the standard preoperative work-up of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trends in Long-Term Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
Choti, M. A., Sitzmann, J. V., Tiburi, M. F., Sumetchotimetha, W., Rangsin, R., Schulick, R. D., Lillemoe, K. D., Yeo, C. J., & Cameron, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200206000-00002 · Cited by 1,454
Adam, R., de Gramont, A., Figueras, J., Kokudo, N., Kunstlinger, F., Loyer, E., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Rubbia-Brandt, L., Sobrero, A., et al. (2015) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.006 · Cited by 607
Self-citationComplete Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Chemotherapy: Does It Mean Cure?
Benoist, S., Brouquet, A., Penna, C., Julié, C., El Hajjam, M., Chagnon, S., Mitry, E., Rougier, P., & Nordlinger, B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.05.8727 · Cited by 607
Perfusion Imaging of the Liver: Current Challenges and Future Goals
Pandharipande, P. V., Krinsky, G. A., Rusinek, H., & Lee, V. S. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2343031362 · Cited by 294
Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: accuracy of helical CT versus SRS.
Kumbasar, B., Kamel, I. R., Tekes, A., Eng, J., Fishman, E. K., & Wahl, R. L. (2004) · Abdominal Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00261-003-0162-3 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Valls, C., Andía, E., Sánchez, A., Gumà, A., Figueras, J., Torras, J., & Serrano, T.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-60
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2314440247
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Preoperative Detection and Assessment of Resectability with Helical CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01dc1155
- The paper
- Valls, C., Andía, E., Sánchez, A., Gumà, A., Figueras, J., Torras, J., & Serrano, T. (2001). Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Preoperative Detection and Assessment of Resectability with Helical CT. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01dc1155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.