The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Detection with Double Arterial Phase Multi-Detector Row Helical CT
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether double arterial phase imaging with multi-detector row helical computed tomography improves detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with 96 hypervascular HCCs underwent double arterial phase imaging of the entire liver. At measured delay after intravenous administration of 2 mL/kg of contrast medium at a rate of 5 mL/sec, the early and late arterial phase images were obtained serially during a single breath hold with interscan delay of 5.0 seconds. Detector row configuration of 2.5 x 4 mm, pitch of 6, and scanning time of 10.5 seconds for each phase were used. Forty 5-mm-thick reconstruction images were obtained for each phase. Each image set was interpreted separately by three observers, who were unaware of tumor burden in the liver, to detect hypervascular HCC. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area below the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) for early and late arterial phases separately and together were calculated. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for hypervascular HCC were 54% and 85% for the early arterial phase, 78% and 83% for the late arterial phase, and 86% and 92% for the double arterial phase, respectively. Double arterial phase imaging showed significantly superior sensitivity compared with early or late arterial phase imaging alone for detecting HCC (P <.05). The mean A(z) value for double arterial phase was significantly higher than that for early or late arterial phase imaging alone (P <.05). Double arterial phase imaging showed the lowest number of false-positive lesions. CONCLUSION: Double arterial phase imaging is recommended to improve detection of hypervascular HCCs and reduce false-positive lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kudo, M., Kawamura, Y., Hasegawa, K., Tateishi, R., Kariyama, K., Shiina, S., Toyoda, H., Imai, Y., Hiraoka, A., Ikeda, M., et al. (2021) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000514174 · Cited by 678
Self-citationBolondi, L., Gaiani, S., Celli, N., Golfieri, R., Grigioni, W. F., Leoni, S., Venturi, A. M., & Piscaglia, F. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20728 · Cited by 451
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Murakami, T., Kim, T., Takamura, M., Hori, M., Takahashi, S., Federle, M. P., Tsuda, K., Osuga, K., Kawata, S., Nakamura, H., & Kudo, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 763-767
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1972766914
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Detection with Double Arterial Phase Multi-Detector Row Helical CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr39763
- The paper
- Murakami, T., Kim, T., Takamura, M., Hori, M., Takahashi, S., Federle, M. P., Tsuda, K., Osuga, K., Kawata, S., Nakamura, H., & Kudo, M. (2001). Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Detection with Double Arterial Phase Multi-Detector Row Helical CT. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr39763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.