The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MR Pulse Sequences: What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask
Abstract
The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is growing exponentially, in part because of the excellent anatomic and pathologic detail provided by the modality and because of recent technologic advances that have led to faster acquisition times. Radiology residents now are introduced in their 1st year of training to the MR pulse sequences routinely used in clinical imaging, including various spin-echo, gradient-echo, inversion-recovery, echo-planar imaging, and MR angiographic sequences. However, to make optimal use of these techniques, radiologists also need a basic knowledge of the physics of MR imaging, including T1 recovery, T2 and T2* decay, repetition time, echo time, and chemical shift effects. In addition, an understanding of contrast weighting is very helpful to obtain better depiction of specific tissues for the diagnosis of various pathologic processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines and evaluation of clinical explainable AI in medical image analysis
Jin, W., Li, X., Fatehi, M., & Hamarneh, G. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102684 · Cited by 199
Detection of white matter lesion regions in MRI using SLIC0 and convolutional neural network
Diniz, P. H. B., Valente, T. L. A., Diniz, J. O. B., Silva, A. C., Gattass, M., Ventura, N., Muniz, B. C., & Gasparetto, E. L. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.011 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bitar, R., Leung, G., Perng, R., Tadros, S., Moody, A. R., Sarrazin, J., McGregor, C., Christakis, M., Symons, S., Nelson, A., & Roberts, T. P.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 513-537
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2159783272
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
