The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiation Exposure and Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned?
Abstract
The potential biological effects of in utero radiation exposure of a developing fetus include prenatal death, intrauterine growth restriction, small head size, mental retardation, organ malformation, and childhood cancer. The risk of each effect depends on the gestational age at the time of exposure, fetal cellular repair mechanisms, and the absorbed radiation dose level. A comparison between the dose levels associated with each of these risks and the estimated fetal doses from typical radiologic examinations lends support to the conclusion that fetal risks are minimal and, therefore, that radiologic and nuclear medicine examinations that may provide significant diagnostic information should not be withheld from pregnant women. The latter position is advocated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, National Council on Radiation Protection, American College of Radiology, and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. However, although the risks are small, it is important to ensure that radiation doses are kept as low as reasonably achievable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Page, R. L., Joglar, J. A., Caldwell, M. A., Calkins, H., Conti, J. B., Deal, B. J., Estes, N. A. M., Field, M. E., Goldberger, Z. D., Hammill, S. C., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000311 · Cited by 595
Liu, D., Li, L., Wu, X., Zheng, D., Wang, J., Yang, L., & Zheng, C. (2020) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.20.23072 · Cited by 572
Radiation Risk From Medical Imaging
Lin, E. C. (2010) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0260 · Cited by 554
Guidelines for Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use During Pregnancy and Lactation
Chen, M. M., Coakley, F. V., Kaimal, A., & Laros, R. K. (2008) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318180a505 · Cited by 468
2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia
Page, R. L., Joglar, J. A., Caldwell, M. A., Calkins, H., Conti, J. B., Deal, B. J., Estes, N. A. M., Field, M. E., Goldberger, Z. D., Hammill, S. C., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.856 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- McCollough, C. H., Schueler, B. A., Atwell, T. D., Braun, N. N., Regner, D. M., Brown, D. L., & LeRoy, A. J.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 909-917
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2135935797
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation Exposure and Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/rg.274065149
- The paper
- McCollough, C. H., Schueler, B. A., Atwell, T. D., Braun, N. N., Regner, D. M., Brown, D. L., & LeRoy, A. J. (2007). Radiation Exposure and Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned? RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274065149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.