Cited by 238Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Adrenal mass imaging with multidetector CT: pathologic conditions, pearls, and pitfalls

Johnson, Pamela T., Horton, Karen M., Fishman, Elliot K.·2009·Radiographics

Abstract

The adrenal gland is involved by a range of neoplasms, including primary and metastatic malignant tumors; however, the most common tumor detected is the incidental benign adenoma. Although computed tomographic (CT) findings will not always yield a definitive diagnosis, attention to these findings provides a road map to guide image interpretation. Adenomas typically demonstrate rapid washout, which is defined as an absolute percentage washout (APW) of more than 60% and a relative percentage washout (RPW) of more than 40% on delayed images. Adrenocortical carcinoma typically has an RPW of less than 40%; however, large size and heterogeneity are more reliable indicators of the diagnosis than are washout values. Washout characteristics of pheochromocytoma are variable; in conjunction with high levels of dynamic enhancement, pheochromocytomas may mimic adenoma (ie, APW > 60%, RPW > 40%). Myelolipomas appear as well-defined masses with variable quantities of fat and soft tissue. After contrast material administration, metastases usually demonstrate slower washout on delayed images (APW < 60%, RPW < 40%) than do adenomas, although hypervascular metastases may enhance similarly to pheochromocytoma. Finally, a number of nonadrenal pathologic conditions have been reported to mimic adrenal masses at CT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/rg.295095027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACCs are typically large tumors upon clinical presentation, often measuring more than 6 cm in diameter.

    “ACCs are typically large tumors upon clinical presentation, often measuring more than 6 cm in diameter (Figure 3 and Table 4) (97).”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [97]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 238

Authors
Johnson, P. T., Horton, K. M., & Fishman, E. K.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Radiographics
Published
2009-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1333-1351
ISSN
  • 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1323
OpenAlex
W2100374947
Cited by
238
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiographics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
adrenal mass, adrenal adenoma, adrenal metastasis, adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, adrenal myelolipoma, contrast washout, multidetector computed tomography, incidental adrenal findings, differential diagnosis, adrenal tumors
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adrenal Glands, Adult, Aged, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review