Radiomic features at CT can distinguish pancreatic cancer from noncancerous pancreas
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To identify distinguishing CT radiomic features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to investigate whether radiomic analysis with machine learning can distinguish between patients who have PDAC and those who do not. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included contrast material–enhanced CT images in 436 patients with PDAC and 479 healthy controls from 2012 to 2018 from Taiwan that were randomly divided for training and testing. Another 100 patients with PDAC (enriched for small PDACs) and 100 controls from Taiwan were identified for testing (from 2004 to 2011). An additional 182 patients with PDAC and 82 healthy controls from the United States were randomly divided for training and testing. Images were processed into patches. An XGBoost (https://xgboost.ai/) model was trained to classify patches as cancerous or noncancerous. Patients were classified as either having or not having PDAC on the basis of the proportion of patches classified as cancerous. For both patch-based and patient-based classification, the models were characterized as either a local model (trained on Taiwanese data only) or a generalized model (trained on both Taiwanese and U.S. data). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for patch- and patient-based analysis for the models. Results The median tumor size was 2.8 cm (interquartile range, 2.0–4.0 cm) in the 536 Taiwanese patients with PDAC (mean age, 65 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 289 men). Compared with normal pancreas, PDACs had lower values for radiomic features reflecting intensity and higher values for radiomic features reflecting heterogeneity. The performance metrics for the developed generalized model when tested on the Taiwanese and U.S. test data sets, respectively, were as follows: sensitivity, 94.7% (177 of 187) and 80.6% (29 of 36); specificity, 95.4% (187 of 196) and 100% (16 of 16); accuracy, 95.0% (364 of 383) and 86.5% (45 of 52); and area under the curve, 0.98 and 0.91. Conclusion Radiomic analysis with machine learning enabled accurate detection of PDAC at CT and could identify patients with PDAC. Keywords: CT, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Pancreas, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on July 30, 2021.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When the model of Chen and Chang et al. was validated in the external test group, an AUC of 0.83 with 48.3% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity, and 86% accuracy was reported.
“When the model was validated in the external test group, an AUC of 0.83 with 48.3% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity, and 86% accuracy was reported [13].”
Two studies accessed the accuracy of radiomics analysis extracted from CT imaging data in the differentiation of PDAC from normal pancreas tissue, and superior accuracy was reported in both (AUC 0.99 and 0.97/0.93).
“However, two studies accessed the accuracy of radiomics analysis extracted from CT imaging data in the differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from normal pancreas tissue [12,13]. Superior accuracy was reported in both, with an AUC of 0.99 in the study of Chu and Park et al. [12] and 0.97/0.93 in the study of Chen and Chang et al. for local/external testing [13].”
Considering overall accuracy, the external validation results of Chen and Chang et al. are comparable with our results for ADC images for the test group, but contrary to that study, low specificity and good sensitivity was achieved in our study.
“Considering the overall accuracy, this is comparable with our results for ADC images for the test group, but contrary to the mentioned study [13], low specificity and good sensitivity was achieved in our study (Table 9).”
In the study of Chen and Chang et al., a patch-based model showed a high AUC (0.97), with 92.2% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity, and 90.6% accuracy in classifying patches of PDAC within a pancreas in the local test group.
“A patch-based model showed a high AUC (0.97), with 92.2% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity, and 90.6% accuracy in classifying patches of PDAC within a pancreas in the local test group [13]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Chen, P.-T., Chang, D., Yen, H., Liu, K.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Roth, H., Wu, M.-S., Liao, W.-C., & Wang, W.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Radiology: Imaging Cancer
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e210010
- ISSN
- 2638-616X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8344348
- OpenAlex
- W3177681144
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Radiology Imaging Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2634-F-002-014-, MOST 107-2634-F-002-016-, MOST 108-2634-F-002-011-, MOST 108-2634-F-002-013-, MOST 109-2634-F-002-028-, MOST 110-2634-F-002-030-)
- National Center for Theoretical Sciences Mathematics Division
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, radiomic features, computed tomography, computer-aided detection, XGBoost, patch-based classification, cross-validation, small pancreatic tumors, tumor heterogeneity, intensity features, United States, model generalization, contrast-enhanced CT, image patches, machine learning classification, radiomics, pancreatic cancer diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Humans, Male, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review