Cited by 9Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

Wide Operating Temperature Range Electrolytes for High Voltage and High Specific Energy Li-Ion Cells

Open access
Smart, Marshall C., Hwang, Constanza, Krause, Frederick C., Soler, Jess, West, William C., Ratnakumar, Bugga V., Amine, Khalil·2013·ECS Transactions

Abstract

A number of electrolyte formulations that have been designed to operate over a wide temperature range have been investigated in conjunction with layered-layered metal oxide cathode materials developed at Argonne. In this study, we have evaluated a number of electrolytes in Li-ion cells consisting of Conoco Phillips A12 graphite anodes and Toda HE5050 Li 1.2 Ni 0.15 Co 0.10 Mn 0.55 O 2 cathodes. The electrolytes studied consisted of LiPF 6 in carbonate-based electrolytes that contain ester co-solvents with various solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) promoting additives, many of which have been demonstrated to perform well in 4V systems. More specifically, we have investigated the performance of a number of methyl butyrate (MB) containing electrolytes (i.e., LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) + ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) + MB (20:20:60 v/v %) that contain various additives, including vinylene carbonate, lithium oxalate, and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB). When these systems were evaluated at various rates at low temperatures, the methyl butyrate-based electrolytes resulted in improved rate capability compared to cells with all carbonate-based formulations. It was also ascertained that the slow cathode kinetics govern the generally poor rate capability at low temperature in contrast to traditionally used LiNi 0.80 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2-based systems, rather than being influenced strongly by the electrolyte type.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/05026.0355ecst

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boron-based salts such as LiBOB, LiDFOB and similar derivatives were used as electrolyte additives due to their good SEI film-forming properties.

    “Some boron-based salts described in Sect.3, such as LiBOB, LiDFOB and similar derivatives, were also used as electrolyte additives due to their good SEI film-forming properties [136, 137].”

    From Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries (2023) · cites this paper as [136]

    The Introduction describes LiBOB as an electrolyte additive among formulations containing SEI-promoting additives. It does not identify LiDFOB or similar boron-based derivatives as additives. The Results and Discussion attribute the LiBOB formulation’s improved performance to a possible cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) effect, rather than demonstrating SEI film formation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Z. Lu, D.D. MacNeil, and J. R. Dahn, Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 4 (12), A200-A203 (2001).
  2. C. S. Johnson, N. Li, J. T. Vaughey, S. A. Hackney, and M. M. Thackeray, Electrochem. Comm., 7 (5), 528-536 (2005).
  3. M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, K. B. Chin, and L. D. Whitcanack, J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (12), A1361-A1374 (2010).
  4. M. C. Smart, B. L. Lucht, S. Dalavi, F. C. Krause, and B. V. Ratnakumar, J. Electrochem. Soc., 159 (6), A739-A751 (2012).
  5. K. A. Smith, M. C. Smart, G. K. S. Prakash, and B. V. Ratnakumar, ECS Trans, 16 (35), 33 (2009).
  6. M. C. Smart, F. C. Krause, W. C. West, J. Soler, G. K. S. Prakash, B. V. Ratnakumar, ECS Trans, 35 (13), 1 (2011).
  7. M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, A. S. Gozdz, and S. Mani, , ECS Trans. 25 (36), 37 (2010).
  8. A. Xiao, L. Yang, and B. L. Lucht, Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 10 (11), A241- 244 (2007).
  9. A. R. Armstrong, M. Holzapfel, P. Novak, C. S. Johnson, S.-H. Kang, M. M. Thackeray, P. G. Bruce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 8694 (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smart, M. C., Hwang, C., Krause, F. C., Soler, J., West, W. C., Ratnakumar, B. V., & Amine, K.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
ECS Transactions
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
50
Issue
26
Pages
355-364
ISSN
  • 1938-5862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-6737
OpenAlex
W2003667386
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ECS Transactions (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, LiPF6 electrolyte, vinylene carbonate, lithium oxalate, LiBOB, graphite anode, rate capability, low-temperature performance, cathode kinetics, high specific energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review