The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Adsorption Behavior of a Ruthenium‐Based Sensitizing Dye to Nanocrystalline TiO2 Coverage Effects on the External and Internal Sensitization Quantum Yields
Open accessAbstract
The adsorption of the ruthenium‐based dye molecules, cis ‐di(thiocyanato)bis(2,2'‐bipyridyl‐4,4'‐dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) (N3), to nanocrystalline (anatase) was studied. Adsorption and desorption kinetics were measured. Effective adsorption isotherms and desorption isotherms were then obtained. A two‐step dye adsorption mechanism is postulated where initial binding of N3 is with one carboxylate, with subsequent binding of two or more carboxylate groups. Dye (N3) coverage effects on the photon‐to‐current conversion efficiencies were investigated by measuring the photocurrent action spectra and the optical absorbance of nanocrystalline films sensitized with various N3 coverages. The incident photon‐to‐current efficiency (IPCE) and the absorbed photon‐to‐current efficiency (APCE) showed abrupt increases at a coverage just above 0.3 monolayers. In order to explain the nonlinear increases in the IPCE and the APCE, the onset of a hole‐hopping mechanism was proposed where at greater than 30% coverage hole transfer between adjacent N3 molecules becomes possible. This percolation of holes through the N3 network facilitates the regeneration of oxidized N3 molecules by the redox species in the matrix of the nanoporous structure, resulting in the sudden increases in the IPCE and the APCE. Other mechanisms for this effect, including a role of N3 clusters in two‐electron oxidation of I‐, are also discussed. © 1999 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioinspired catecholic chemistry for surface modification
Ye, Q., Zhou, F., & Liu, W. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15026j · Cited by 1,177
High-Efficiency “Green” Quantum Dot Solar Cells
Pan, Z., Mora-Seró, I., Shen, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Zhao, K., Wang, J., Zhong, X., & Bisquert, J. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja504310w · Cited by 608
Neale, N. R., Kopidakis, N., van de Lagemaat, J., Grätzel, M., & Frank, A. J. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0538666 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Fillinger, A., & Parkinson, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4559-4564
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2029807945
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Adsorption Behavior of a Ruthenium‐Based Sensitizing Dye to Nanocrystalline TiO2 Coverage Effects on the External and Internal Sensitization Quantum Yields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1392674
- The paper
- Fillinger, A., & Parkinson, B. A. (1999). The Adsorption Behavior of a Ruthenium‐Based Sensitizing Dye to Nanocrystalline TiO2 Coverage Effects on the External and Internal Sensitization Quantum Yields. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1392674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.