The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Some Organic Additives on Lithium Deposition in Propylene Carbonate
Abstract
The effects of some film-forming organic additives, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), vinylene carbonate (VC), and ethylene sulfite (ES), on lithium deposition and dissolution were investigated in 1 M dissolved in propylene carbonate (PC) as a base solution. When 5 wt % FEC was added, the cycling efficiency was improved. On the contrary, addition of 5 wt % VC or ES significantly lowered the cycling efficiency. The surface morphology of lithium deposited in each electrolyte solution was observed by in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM). In the surface was covered with a uniform and closely packed layer of particle-like deposits of about 100-150 nm diam. The surface film seemed to be more solid in and inhomogeneous in From ac impedance measurements, it was revealed that the surface film formed in has a lower resistance than that in the additive-free solution, whereas that formed in or has a higher resistance. Large volume changes during lithium deposition and dissolution require that the surface film should be elastic (or soft) and be self-repairable when being damaged. In addition, a nonuniform current distribution is liable to cause dendrite formation, which requires that the surface film should be uniform and its resistance should be as low as possible. gave a surface film that satisfies all these requirements, and therefore only FEC was effective as an additive for deposition and dissolution of lithium metal. © 2002 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Dendrite-Free Lithium Deposition via Self-Healing Electrostatic Shield Mechanism
Ding, F., Xu, W., Graff, G. L., Zhang, J., Sushko, M. L., Chen, X., Shao, Y., Engelhard, M. H., Nie, Z., Xiao, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja312241y · Cited by 2,107
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
A review of lithium deposition in lithium-ion and lithium metal secondary batteries
Li, Z., Huang, J., Yann Liaw, B., Metzler, V., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.099 · Cited by 938
Zhang, H., Eshetu, G. G., Judez, X., Li, C., Rodriguez‐Martínez, L. M., & Armand, M. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201712702 · Cited by 774
Metadata
- Authors
- Mogi, R., Inaba, M., Jeong, S.-K., Iriyama, Y., Abe, T., & Ogumi, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- A1578
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053230744
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Some Organic Additives on Lithium Deposition in Propylene Carbonate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1516770
- The paper
- Mogi, R., Inaba, M., Jeong, S.-K., Iriyama, Y., Abe, T., & Ogumi, Z. (2002). Effects of Some Organic Additives on Lithium Deposition in Propylene Carbonate. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1516770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.