The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies show that the SEI on lithium and on anodes in liquid nonaqueous solutions consists of many different materials including , LiF, LiCl, , alkoxides, and nonconducting polymers. The equivalent circuit for such a mosaic‐type SEI electrode is extremely complex. It is shown that near room temperature the grain‐boundary resistance ( R gb ) for polyparticle solid electrolytes is larger than the bulk ionic resistance. Up to now, all models of SEI electrodes ignored the contribution of R gb to the overall SEI resistance. We show here that this neglect has no justification. On the basis of recent results, we propose here for SEI electrodes equivalent circuits which take into account the contribution of grain‐boundary and other interfacial impedance terms. This model accounts for a variety of different types of Nyquist plots reported for lithium and electrodes in liquid nonaqueous and polymer electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The SEI formed in this standard electrolyte resembles the mosaic structure predicted by Peled et al. [166], who described the SEI as a heterogeneous distribution of inorganic and organic components.”
From Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries (2023) · cites this paper as [166]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- E. Peled, This Journal, 126, 2047 (1 979).
- E. Peled, in Lithium Batteries, J. P. Gabano, Editor, p. 43, Academic Press, New York (1 983).
- J. G.Thevenin and R. H. Muller, This Journal, 134,273 (1987).
- Y. E. Ely and D. Aurbach, Langmuir, 8, 1845 (1992).
- M. Odziemkovski and D. E. Irish, This Journal, 140, 1546 (1 994).
- M. Odziemkowski and D. E. Irish, ibid., 139, 363 (1992).
- G. Ardel, D. Golodnitsky, E. Strauss, and E. Peled, in Proceedings of the 37th International Power Sources Symposium (ARL), Cherry Hill, NJ, p. 283, IEEE (1996).
- G. Ardel, D. Golodnitsky, E. Strauss, and E. Peled, Abstract 81, p. 104a, The Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 96-2, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 6-1 1, 1996.
- L. Dominey, in Lithium Batteries, New Materials, Development, and Perspectives, G. Pistoia, Editor, Elsevier, p. 137, New York (1 994).
- D. Bar-Tow, E. Peled, and L. Burshtein, Abstract 835, p. 1028, The Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 96-2, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 6-1 1, 1996.
- E. Peled, D. Golodnitsky, G. Ardel, C. Menachem, D. Bar-Tow, and V. Eshkenazy, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 393,209 (1995).
- N. Takami and T. Ohsaki, This Journal, 139, 1849 (1992).
- D. Aurbach, I. Weissman, A. Zaban, and 0. Chuzid (Youngman), Electrochim. Acta, 39, 51 (1994).
- S. Fouache-Ayoub, M. Garreau, F? V. S. S. Prabhu, and J. Thevelin, This Journal, 137, 1659 (1 990).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,653
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries
Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M., & Komaba, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500192f · Cited by 6,598
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X., Zhang, R., Zhao, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,278
30 Years of Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Li, M., Lu, J. B., Chen, Z., & Amine, K. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800561 · Cited by 6,141
Metadata
- Authors
- Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- L208-L210
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2037447290
- Cited by
- 1,205
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tel Aviv University
- Ministry of Defense
- U.S. Air Force
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Keywords
- solid electrolyte interphase, grain boundary resistance, interfacial impedance, lithium metal anode, lithium-ion batteries, polymer electrolytes, Nyquist plot, lithium fluoride
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
