The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyses of Self‐Humidification and Suppression of Gas Crossover in Pt‐Dispersed Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Fuel Cells
Abstract
New polymer electrolyte membranes for polymer‐electrolyte‐membrane (PEM) fuel cells (PEFCs) have been developed. Platinum nanocrystals ( d = 1–2 nm) were highly dispersed in a Nafion 112 film (Pt‐PEM, thickness 50 μm) to catalyze the recombination of the crossover H 2 with O 2 , and the water generated was found to humidify the Pt‐PEM directly. In order to clarify the self‐humidifying properties in the Pt‐PEM, the amount of water vapor produced by the recombination and the faradaic reaction was analyzed together with those of consumed H 2 and O 2 by monitoring humidity in the exhausting gases from PEFCs operated with dry H 2 and O 2 at 80°C. The H 2 used for the self‐humidification increased with increasing output current density, but the total H 2 consumption decreased to ca. 2/3 of that in normal membranes. All H 2 O produced inside the Pt‐PEM was found to be exhausted from the anode, resulting in the efficient humidification of the membrane on the anode side, which is dried by electro‐osmotic drag. Thus, the resistance of the Pt‐PEM was lowered to 0.04 Ω cm 2 . It is also found that the Pt‐PEM improved the cathode potential distinctively, which was ascribed to elimination of the chemical reaction of crossover gases in the cathode catalyst layer, and eliminated any disturbance of O 2 diffusion by H 2 O vapor produced by the reaction. The operation of PEFCs with minimal or no humidification by using Pt‐PEMs is essential in applications to power sources for electric vehicles or various electronic devices from the viewpoints of the simplification of control systems, cold starts, or response to abrupt load changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications
Peighambardoust, S. J., Rowshanzamir, S., & Amjadi, M. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017 · Cited by 2,186
Composite Membranes for Medium-Temperature PEM Fuel Cells
Alberti, G., & Casciola, M. (2003) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022702.154702 · Cited by 522
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1580822 · Cited by 411
Mixed matrix proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: State of the art and perspectives
Bakangura, E., Wu, L., Ge, L., Yang, Z., & Xu, T. (2016) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.11.004 · Cited by 319
Tufa, R. A., Pawlowski, S., Veerman, J., Bouzek, K., Fontananova, E., di Profio, G., Velizarov, S., Goulão Crespo, J., Nijmeijer, K., & Curcio, E. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.111 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, M., Uchida, H., & Emori, M.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1137-1141
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2038952576
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyses of Self‐Humidification and Suppression of Gas Crossover in Pt‐Dispersed Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Fuel Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1838429
- The paper
- Watanabe, M., Uchida, H., & Emori, M. (1998). Analyses of Self‐Humidification and Suppression of Gas Crossover in Pt‐Dispersed Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Fuel Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.