The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liquid Water Removal from a Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell
Open accessAbstract
Liquid water transport and removal from the gas diffusion layer (GDL) and gas channel of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) are studied experimentally and theoretically. In situ observations of the liquid water distribution on the GDL surface and inside the gas channel were made in an operating transparent PEFC. Liquid droplet formation and emergence from the GDL surface are characterized and two modes of liquid water removal from the GDL surface identified: one through droplet detachment by the shear force of the core gas flow followed by a mist flow in the gas channel, and the other by capillary wicking onto the more hydrophilic channel walls followed by the annular film flow and/or liquid slug flow in the channel. In the former regime, typical of high gas flow rates, the droplet detachment diameter is correlated well with the mean gas velocity in the channel. In the latter regime characteristic of low gas flow rates, liquid spreading over hydrophilic channel surfaces and drainage via corner flow were observed and analyzed. A theory is developed to determine what operating parameters and channel surface contact angles lead to sufficient liquid drainage from the fuel cell via corner flow. Under these conditions, the fuel cell could operate stably under a low flow rate (or stoichiometry) with only a minimum pressure drop required to drive the oxidizer flow. However, when the corner flow is insufficient to remove liquid water from the gas channel, it was observed that the annular film flow occurs, often followed by film instability and channel clogging. Channel clogging shuts down an entire channel and hence reduces the cell's active area and overall performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1580822 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
Jiao, K., & Li, X. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.002 · Cited by 1,086
Andersson, M., Beale, S. B., Espinoza, M., Wu, Z., & Lehnert, W. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.010 · Cited by 204
Transient non-isothermal model of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell
Shah, A. A., Kim, G.-S., Sui, P. C., & Harvey, D. (2007) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.022 · Cited by 146
Pore-Water Morphological Transitions in Polymer Electrolyte of a Fuel Cell
Hwang, G. S., Kaviany, M., Nam, J. H., Kim, M. H., & Son, S. Y. (2009) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3186027 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, F. Y., Yang, X. G., & Wang, C. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- A225
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123459220
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.